8.147, Disc: English Future

linguist at linguistlist.org linguist at linguistlist.org
Sat Feb 1 04:56:48 UTC 1997


LINGUIST List:  Vol-8-147. Fri Jan 31 1997. ISSN: 1068-4875.

Subject: 8.147, Disc: English Future

Moderators: Anthony Rodrigues Aristar: Texas A&M U. <aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Dry: Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at linguistlist.org>
            T. Daniel Seely: Eastern Michigan U. <seely at linguistlist.org>

Review Editor:     Andrew Carnie <carnie at linguistlist.org>

Associate Editors: Ljuba Veselinova <ljuba at linguistlist.org>
                   Ann Dizdar <ann at linguistlist.org>
Assistant Editor:  Sue Robinson <sue at linguistlist.org>
Technical Editor:  Ron Reck <ron at linguistlist.org>

Software development: John H. Remmers <remmers at emunix.emich.edu>
                      Zhiping Zheng <zzheng at online.emich.edu>

Home Page:  http://linguistlist.org/

Editor for this issue: Anthony Rodrigues Aristar <aristar at linguistlist.org>

=================================Directory=================================

1)
Date:  Fri, 31 Jan 1997 12:52:19 -0500 (EST)
From:  Carl.Mills at UC.Edu
Subject:  The English Future

-------------------------------- Message 1 -------------------------------

Date:  Fri, 31 Jan 1997 12:52:19 -0500 (EST)
From:  Carl.Mills at UC.Edu
Subject:  The English Future

In his interesting posts concerning Ebonics, Ron Anderson writes

>Those who read in First Grade give future tense markers, those who
>don't read don't give future tense markers, typically.

Is it just me--am I being a middle-aged nitpicker--or does anyone elso
differ with the notion that English has "future tense markers?"  Maybe
it's because I have worked with a language or two that have real
(surface, morphological) future tense markers, but I tend to find the
conflation of time, which is semantic, with tense, which (I believe) is
syntactic, a bit off-putting.  Or does the fact that some languages,
English among them, tend to indicate futurity periphrastically--through
the use of certain modal auxiliaries, the use of time adverbials,
etc.--matter when we are talking about such matters?

Carl Mills

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-8-147



More information about the LINGUIST mailing list