8.304, Disc: Myths in linguistics

[linguist at linguistlist.org]

LINGUIST List:  Vol-8-304. Sat Mar 1 1997. ISSN: 1068-4875.

Subject: 8.304, Disc: Myths in linguistics

Moderators: Anthony Rodrigues Aristar: Texas A&M U. <aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Dry: Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at linguistlist.org>
            T. Daniel Seely: Eastern Michigan U. <seely at linguistlist.org>

Review Editor:     Andrew Carnie <carnie at linguistlist.org>

Associate Editors: Ljuba Veselinova <ljuba at linguistlist.org>
                   Ann Dizdar <ann at linguistlist.org>
Assistant Editor:  Sue Robinson <sue at linguistlist.org>
Technical Editor:  Ron Reck <ron at linguistlist.org>

Software development: John H. Remmers <remmers at emunix.emich.edu>
                      Zhiping Zheng <zzheng at online.emich.edu>

Home Page:  http://linguistlist.org/

Editor for this issue: T. Daniel Seely <seely at linguistlist.org>

=================================Directory=================================

1)
Date:  Thu, 27 Feb 1997 09:13:27 -0800 (PST)
From:  Stefan Kaufmann <kaufmann at Csli.Stanford.EDU>
Subject:  Re: 8.286, Disc: Myths in linguistics

-------------------------------- Message 1 -------------------------------

Date:  Thu, 27 Feb 1997 09:13:27 -0800 (PST)
From:  Stefan Kaufmann <kaufmann at Csli.Stanford.EDU>
Subject:  Re: 8.286, Disc: Myths in linguistics

This might, after all, lead to an interesting discussion on what a "myth"
in science is after all. I would like to remind people that the word
"myth" has already been used in a way related to what the initiator of
this discussion had in mind. An example would be Roy Andrew Miller's
"Japan's Modern Myth. The Language and Beyond" where he relies on previous
non-linguistic work in his definition of a myth (in science, that is).
More recently, Miller's book inspired V.M. Alpatov to call his book on the
history of Marrism in the Soviet Union "Istoriaja odnogo mifa. Marr i
Marrizm", where he explicitly refers to Miller and devotes some discussion
to why he chose the title.

One must say, though, that Miller and Alpatov talk about very, very
different phenomena. I'd like to know what others think about this.

Stefan Kaufmann

Stefan Kaufmann
Dept. of Linguistics and CSLI
Stanford University
http://www-leland.stanford.edu/~kaufmann

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-8-304