9.1758, Qs: Syntax, Eng. possessives, Chinese constructions

[LINGUIST Network]

LINGUIST List:  Vol-9-1758. Thu Dec 10 1998. ISSN: 1068-4875.

Subject: 9.1758, Qs: Syntax, Eng. possessives, Chinese constructions

Moderators: Anthony Rodrigues Aristar: Wayne State U.<aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Dry: Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at linguistlist.org>
            Andrew Carnie: U. of Arizona <carnie at linguistlist.org>

Reviews: Andrew Carnie: U. of Arizona <carnie at linguistlist.org>

Associate Editors:  Martin Jacobsen <marty at linguistlist.org>
                    Brett Churchill <brett at linguistlist.org>
                    Ljuba Veselinova <ljuba at linguistlist.org>

Assistant Editors:  Scott Fults <scott at linguistlist.org>
		    Jody Huellmantel <jody at linguistlist.org>
		    Karen Milligan <karen at linguistlist.org>

Software development: John H. Remmers <remmers at emunix.emich.edu>
                      Chris Brown <chris at linguistlist.org>

Home Page:  http://linguistlist.org/


Editor for this issue: Jody Huellmantel <jody at linguistlist.org>
 ==========================================================================

We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually
best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is
then  strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list.   This policy was
instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we
would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.

=================================Directory=================================

1)
Date:  11 Dec 1998 11:05:38 -0000
From:  ressy at 163.net
Subject:  Syntax of Wh-words

2)
Date:  Thu, 10 Dec 1998 22:35:21 -0500 (EST)
From:  Takae Tsujioka <tsujiokt at gusun.georgetown.edu>
Subject:  English possessives & relatives

3)
Date:  11 Dec 1998 11:56:12 -0000
From:  gdufs_cecilia_liu at 163.net
Subject:  Chinese constructions

-------------------------------- Message 1 -------------------------------

Date:  11 Dec 1998 11:05:38 -0000
From:  ressy at 163.net
Subject:  Syntax of Wh-words


Dear person(s),

I am doing research in the sub-word level syntax of Wh-words and the
fuctional head C and their relationship. As far as I know, Dylan Tsai
has touched this domain. But I am not sure whether you know somebody
else who has also touched this ground. If you have any information, just
let me know. Your help will be greatly honored.

Thanks for your information.
Ressy Y. Ares

http://www.163.net


-------------------------------- Message 2 -------------------------------

Date:  Thu, 10 Dec 1998 22:35:21 -0500 (EST)
From:  Takae Tsujioka <tsujiokt at gusun.georgetown.edu>
Subject:  English possessives & relatives

Dear LINGUIST subscribers:

I am working on the syntax of possession across languages as my
dissertation topic, and have encountered some intriguing patterns in
English. That is, when possessive phrases are present, there seems to
be a strong tendency among native speakers of English to reject
"that-less" or "zero" relatives.

(1) a. the computer, which John bought last week
    b. the computer that John bought last week
    c. the computer John bought last week

(2) a. John's computer, which he bought last week
    b. John's computer that he bought last week
    c. */? John's computer he bought last week

Similarly,

(3) a. John's sister, who(m) Mary likes
    b. John's sister that Mary likes
    c. */? John's sister Mary likes

As far as I can see, this is problematic for (what I take it to be) a
standard view that "the computer that John bought.." and "the computer
John bought.." differ only in that the latter has a null C. Also, it
seems to have some implications for the structure of possessives
and/or relatives in relation to Kayne (1994)'s analyses. Since I am
not aware of the literature which dealt with this problem, I would be
grateful if someone can help me find out if anyone discovered this and
gave an analysis. If you know of any related patterns in English or in
other languages, I would be very interested in hearing about it, too.

I will post a summary if there is enough interest.

Thank you very much in advance!

Takae Tsujioka

*******************************************
Takae Tsujioka
Graduate Fellow in Theoretical Linguistics
Georgetown University
tsujiokt at gusun.georgetown.edu
*******************************************



-------------------------------- Message 3 -------------------------------

Date:  11 Dec 1998 11:56:12 -0000
From:  gdufs_cecilia_liu at 163.net
Subject:  Chinese constructions


Dear persons,

I'm studying A-not-A constructions in Chinese. Do you have any idea
about this topic? It seems not many people are doing study on this. I
find it hard to get materials on this topic. Please help me.

Wish you a good day.
Liu Ya

http://www.163.net

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-9-1758