9.219, Sum: ASL/L1, L2

Fri Feb 13 05:45:21 UTC 1998

LINGUIST List:  Vol-9-219. Fri Feb 13 1998. ISSN: 1068-4875.

Subject: 9.219, Sum: ASL/L1, L2

Moderators: Anthony Rodrigues Aristar: Texas A&M U. <aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Dry: Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at linguistlist.org>

Review Editor:     Andrew Carnie <carnie at linguistlist.org>

Assistant Editors:  Brett Churchill <brett at linguistlist.org>
		    Martin Jacobsen <marty at linguistlist.org>
		    Elaine Halleck <elaine at linguistlist.org>
                    Anita Huang <anita at linguistlist.org>
                    Ljuba Veselinova <ljuba at linguistlist.org>
		    Julie Wilson <julie at linguistlist.org>

Software development: John H. Remmers <remmers at emunix.emich.edu>
                      Zhiping Zheng <zzheng at online.emich.edu>

Home Page:  http://linguistlist.org/

Editor for this issue: Martin Jacobsen <marty at linguistlist.org>

=================================Directory=================================

1)
Date:  Thu, 12 Feb 1998 23:36:37 -0600 (CST)
From:  Megan Elizabeth Melancon <mmelan2 at tiger.lsu.edu>
Subject:  Summary: ASL/L1, L2

-------------------------------- Message 1 -------------------------------

Date:  Thu, 12 Feb 1998 23:36:37 -0600 (CST)
From:  Megan Elizabeth Melancon <mmelan2 at tiger.lsu.edu>
Subject:  Summary: ASL/L1, L2

Last week I posted a query about American Sign Language and deaf
children with parents who spoke no English.  The issue is what is
considered the child's L1 if his/her parents communicate (in whatever
fashion) in the 'foreign' language.  This is the language the child
learns at a very early age.  However, when the child goes to school,
he/she is exposed to both ASL and signed English, especially in
English classes (assuming the child is in the States, of course).  I
was flamed for supposedly implying that ASL is just translated
English.  Of course it is not, yet the signs are translated into
English (again, in the States).

In addition, there were several respondents who suggested that the
terminology of 'mother tongue', L1, L2, etc. were not effective or
efficient.  Suggested instead were 'primary language', 'family
language', 'family L1', 'secondary language' and 'language of
parents'.

Two other issues arose.  Lloyd Anderson said that (for deaf children
of hearing parents) "the mother tongue is not the same thing as the
language of the parents", and that a deaf child may "learn little bits
of things about a spoken language first", but they will not 'learn' a
spoken language first. Marie Egan said that deaf children, due to
their sometimes late exposure to a language "may not have a 'native
language'".  Interesting in terms of innateness and Bickerton's
bioprogram.

However, perhaps the most cogent response was the suggestion that this
discussion belongs on the Sign Language Linguistics list
(SSLING-L at admin.humberc.on.ca), so I'll end this with the suggestions
and references which were sent to me.

Many thanks to the following people (in order of appearance): Marie
Egan, Phoevos Panagiotid, Ben Karlin, Lloyd Anderson, Nancy Frishberg,
Lynn Santelmann, Shanley Allen, Sangeeta Bagga-Gup, Naomi Nagy, Doug
Stringham, Theresa B. Smith, Mark Mandel, Cindy Neuroth-Gimbrone.

Suggested authors:

Barbara Gerner de Garcia
Mary Jan Pollisco
Richard Meier
Rachel Mayberry (McGill Univ.)
Nini Hoiting (Gyuot Royal Institute)
Susan Goldwin-Meadow
Elissa Newport

Suggested Journals:

Sign Language Studies
Journal of Exceptional Children

Suggested internet:

http://www.gallaudet.edu
SLLING-Ladmin.humberc.on.ca