9.293, Disc: Wh Movement

The LINGUIST List linguist at linguistlist.org
Fri Feb 27 07:54:57 UTC 1998


LINGUIST List:  Vol-9-293. Fri Feb 27 1998. ISSN: 1068-4875.

Subject: 9.293, Disc: Wh Movement

Moderators: Anthony Rodrigues Aristar: Texas A&M U. <aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Dry: Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at linguistlist.org>

Review Editor:     Andrew Carnie <carnie at linguistlist.org>

Editors:  	    Brett Churchill <brett at linguistlist.org>
		    Martin Jacobsen <marty at linguistlist.org>
		    Elaine Halleck <elaine at linguistlist.org>
                    Anita Huang <anita at linguistlist.org>
                    Ljuba Veselinova <ljuba at linguistlist.org>
		    Julie Wilson <julie at linguistlist.org>

Software development: John H. Remmers <remmers at emunix.emich.edu>
                      Zhiping Zheng <zzheng at online.emich.edu>

Home Page:  http://linguistlist.org/


Editor for this issue: Julie Wilson <julie at linguistlist.org>

=================================Directory=================================

1)
Date:  Thu, 19 Feb 1998 15:10:47 +0100
From:  Lukasz Pielasa <lluke at kki.net.pl>
Subject:  Q: wh-movement

-------------------------------- Message 1 -------------------------------

Date:  Thu, 19 Feb 1998 15:10:47 +0100
From:  Lukasz Pielasa <lluke at kki.net.pl>
Subject:  Q: wh-movement

 A friend of mine is currently struggling with her MA thesis on wh-mvt. A
pertinent question that she has asked me time and again is: in the sentence
Who is the best? and generally in wh-questions about the subject, do we
allow vacuous mvt. of who to [spec, cp]? And, subsequently, of is to C?
Otherwise, how do we get the contracted Who's the best? Or (if Bob didn't
kill John, nor did Betty, then) Who DID kill John? Or perhaps traces do not
block contraction? Please, help.

I suppose minimalism would not recognise this as a problem, and presumably
GB would say move vacuously. Or am I wrong? What do other theoretic
frameworks (HPSG, optimality, etc.) have to say on that issue?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-9-293



More information about the LINGUIST mailing list