9.867, Disc: American Sign Language

[LINGUIST Network]

LINGUIST List:  Vol-9-867. Thu Jun 11 1998. ISSN: 1068-4875.

Subject: 9.867, Disc: American Sign Language

Moderators: Anthony Rodrigues Aristar: Texas A&M U. <aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Dry: Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at linguistlist.org>

Review Editor:     Andrew Carnie <carnie at linguistlist.org>

Editors:  	    Brett Churchill <brett at linguistlist.org>
		    Martin Jacobsen <marty at linguistlist.org>
		    Elaine Halleck <elaine at linguistlist.org>
                    Anita Huang <anita at linguistlist.org>
                    Ljuba Veselinova <ljuba at linguistlist.org>
		    Julie Wilson <julie at linguistlist.org>

Software development: John H. Remmers <remmers at emunix.emich.edu>
                      Zhiping Zheng <zzheng at online.emich.edu>

Home Page:  http://linguistlist.org/


Editor for this issue: Julie Wilson <julie at linguistlist.org>

=================================Directory=================================

1)
Date:  Tue, 24 Nov 1987 17:11:07 -0600 (CST)
From:  "Fidelholtz James L." <jfidel at siu.buap.mx>
Subject:  ASL Pronouns

-------------------------------- Message 1 -------------------------------

Date:  Tue, 24 Nov 1987 17:11:07 -0600 (CST)
From:  "Fidelholtz James L." <jfidel at siu.buap.mx>
Subject:  ASL Pronouns

	 Emily Bender's refutation of everybody's idea of
ASL pronouns seems to me to be off the mark.  It may be because of
insufficient familiarity with ASL, but it's a little hard for me to accept
this use of deictics (pointing to a preassigned part of the signing space)
as 'phonology', except very metaphorically.  The fact is that non-users of
ASL do virtually the same thing in the gestures which accompany their
speech, but in a way that is very individualized, while remaining, I'm
sure, within culturally (or linguistically?) set bounds.  The studies I'm
familiar with of this latter phenomenon, while indicating the seeming
universality of the phenomenon, point out the individual aspects which
vary with the speaker, and these make it seem very unlikely to me that
they are analogous to the phonology of spoken language.
	Jim

James L. Fidelholtz			e-mail: jfidel at cen.buap.mx
Maestri'a en Ciencias del Lenguaje
Instituto de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades
Beneme'rita Universidad Auto'noma de Puebla, ME'XICO

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-9-867