9.469, Sum: Twin Language

[The LINGUIST List]

LINGUIST List:  Vol-9-469. Fri Mar 27 1998. ISSN: 1068-4875.

Subject: 9.469, Sum: Twin Language

Moderators: Anthony Rodrigues Aristar: Texas A&M U. <aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Dry: Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at linguistlist.org>

Review Editor:     Andrew Carnie <carnie at linguistlist.org>

Editors:  	    Brett Churchill <brett at linguistlist.org>
		    Martin Jacobsen <marty at linguistlist.org>
		    Elaine Halleck <elaine at linguistlist.org>
                    Anita Huang <anita at linguistlist.org>
                    Ljuba Veselinova <ljuba at linguistlist.org>
		    Julie Wilson <julie at linguistlist.org>

Software development: John H. Remmers <remmers at emunix.emich.edu>
                      Zhiping Zheng <zzheng at online.emich.edu>

Home Page:  http://linguistlist.org/


Editor for this issue: Martin Jacobsen <marty at linguistlist.org>

=================================Directory=================================

1)
Date:  Thu, 26 Mar 1998 19:44:51 -0700
From:  comrie at almaak.usc.edu (Bernard Comrie)
Subject:  Twin Language

-------------------------------- Message 1 -------------------------------

Date:  Thu, 26 Mar 1998 19:44:51 -0700
From:  comrie at almaak.usc.edu (Bernard Comrie)
Subject:  Twin Language


Some time ago I posted a query to the Linguist List asking for
references on twin languages (cryptophasia). Since a couple of people
have since asked me what I found, I think it might be useful for me to
post my bibliographical findings to the List. In addition, Jennifer
Ganger <jganger at psyche.mit.edu> maintains a more general bibliography
on twins' languages.

The general conclusion of the literature is that twin languages are
not particularly autonomous; their apparent autonomy reflects rather
greater distortion than normal of the language(s) of the twins'
environment.

References on Twin Languages (cryptophasia)

Bakker, Peter. 1987. Autonomous Languages: Signed and Spoken Languages
created by children in the light of Bickerton's Bioprogram
Hypothesis. University of Amsterdam, Publikaties van het instituut
voor algemene taalwetenschap, number 53. [The best single source.]

Bakker, P. 1987. Autonomous languages of twins. Acta
Genet. Med. Gemellol.  36:233-238.

Bakker, P. 1990. Autonomous language - natural or not? In: Walter Koch
(ed.) - Natuerlichkeit der Sprache und der Kultur. Bochum:
Brockmeyer. pp.  74-95.

Diehl, Randy L. & Kolodzey, Katherine F. 1980. The sound system of
Spaka.  Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 67: 2112-2114.

Diehl, Randy L. & Kolodzey, Katherine F. 1981. Spaka: A privative
language.  Language 57: 406-424.

Dodd, Barbara & Sandra McEvoy. 1994. Twin language or phonological
disorder?.Journal of Child Language 21: 273-289.

Luebbe, Henning. Soziologische Aspekte einer Theorie des
Spracherwerbs.  Freiburg: Hochschulverlag.

Luria, A. R., and F. Ia. Yudovich. 1971. Speech and the development of
mental processes in the child. Baltimore: Penguin.

Malmstrom, P.M & Silva, M.N. 1986. Twin talk.  Manifestations of twin
status in the speech of toddlers.  Journal of Child Language 13:
293-304.

Savic, Svenka. 1980.  How twins learn to talk. New York: Academic
Press (Serbo-Croatian original: Kako blizanci uce da govore. Novi Sad,
1977: University of Novi Sad).

Zazzo, R. 1960. Les jumeaux. Le couple et la personne.  Paris: Presses
Universitaires de France.

-
Bernard Comrie
Dept of Linguistics GFS-301                 tel  +1 213 740 3674
University of Southern California           fax  +1 213 740 9306
Los Angeles, CA 90089-1693, USA       e-mail  comrie at bcf.usc.edu

Address from mid-May 1998 (new telephone, fax, e-mail not yet
available): Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology
Inselstrasse 22-26 D-04103 Leipzig, Germany

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-9-469