9.641, Qs: Icelandic, Word order, Verb freq, Double object

[LINGUIST Network]

LINGUIST List:  Vol-9-641. Sat May 2 1998. ISSN: 1068-4875.

Subject: 9.641, Qs: Icelandic, Word order, Verb freq, Double object

Moderators: Anthony Rodrigues Aristar: Texas A&M U. <aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Dry: Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at linguistlist.org>

Review Editor:     Andrew Carnie <carnie at linguistlist.org>

Editors:  	    Brett Churchill <brett at linguistlist.org>
		    Martin Jacobsen <marty at linguistlist.org>
		    Elaine Halleck <elaine at linguistlist.org>
                    Anita Huang <anita at linguistlist.org>
                    Ljuba Veselinova <ljuba at linguistlist.org>
		    Julie Wilson <julie at linguistlist.org>

Software development: John H. Remmers <remmers at emunix.emich.edu>
                      Zhiping Zheng <zzheng at online.emich.edu>

Home Page:  http://linguistlist.org/


Editor for this issue: Brett Churchill <brett at linguistlist.org>
 ==========================================================================

We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually
best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is
then  strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list.   This policy was
instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we
would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.

=================================Directory=================================

1)
Date:  Thu, 30 Apr 1998 22:03:33 -0700
From:  "Joong-Sun Sohn" <sohn at falcon.cc.ukans.edu>
Subject:  Looking for an Icelandic

2)
Date:  Fri, 1 May 1998 10:33:07 -0400 (EDT)
From:  "Anjum P. Saleemi" <saleemi at psyche.mit.edu>
Subject:  Word Order Query

3)
Date:  Fri, 1 May 1998 21:29:45 -0400 (EDT)
From:  Marcia Bronstein <marciab at umd5.umd.edu>
Subject:  verb form frequency

4)
Date:  Sat, 2 May 1998 09:03:33 -0700 (PDT)
From:  bingfu <bingfu at usc.edu>
Subject:  double object and dative structures

-------------------------------- Message 1 -------------------------------

Date:  Thu, 30 Apr 1998 22:03:33 -0700
From:  "Joong-Sun Sohn" <sohn at falcon.cc.ukans.edu>
Subject:  Looking for an Icelandic


I am looking for a native Icelandic speaker for
my dissertation research that is purely linguistic (it's about reflexive
marking). I heard there is one on KU campus, but I could not find the person. Iprefer speakers living in the vicinity of Lawrence, Kansas (Wichita, Topeka,
Kansas City, ect.), but not necessary. If you know one, please let me
know.
 
Thank you.

Joong-Sun Sohn
Linguistics Department
University of Kansas
Lawrence, KS 66045
U.S.A.


-------------------------------- Message 2 -------------------------------

Date:  Fri, 1 May 1998 10:33:07 -0400 (EDT)
From:  "Anjum P. Saleemi" <saleemi at psyche.mit.edu>
Subject:  Word Order Query

Hi!

This is just a typological/data question. Could someone out there tell me
if there is any known language which has the following word order: STVOC,
where (to state the obvious) S stands for Subject, T for Tense, V for
verb, and C for Complementizer. In other words, can a language be
head-initial in respect of T and V but head-final in respect of C? Would
be grateful for any information bearing on this issue.

Anjum Saleemi
Brain & Cognitive Sciences/
Linguistics and Philosophy
MIT


-------------------------------- Message 3 -------------------------------

Date:  Fri, 1 May 1998 21:29:45 -0400 (EDT)
From:  Marcia Bronstein <marciab at umd5.umd.edu>
Subject:  verb form frequency

Can anyone direct me to published or unpublished studies of verb
tense/form frequency in written English?  I'm looking for research
on frequency rates of tense, aspect or other verb features in any
corpus type, as I conduct my own studies.

For example --  in a particular body of English texts, rate
of one structure such as present perfect or a variety of
structures, rate of verbs with future meaning, rates of modals
categorized according to surface structure or function.

Any structural or semantic design is of interest to me.

Thanks in advance for your replies and I will summarize.

Marcia Bronstein, Montgomery College, Takoma Park, Maryland, USA 20912
marciab at umd5.umd.edu



-------------------------------- Message 4 -------------------------------

Date:  Sat, 2 May 1998 09:03:33 -0700 (PDT)
From:  bingfu <bingfu at usc.edu>
Subject:  double object and dative structures

Query: double object and dative structures

	It seems all double object structures can shift to dative
structures, but the reverse does not always hold, as shown in examples
below.

	 (1)	a.	I give it to John.
		b.	*I give John it.

 	 (2)	a.	I give it to him.
		b.	*I give him it.

	Now, I would like to know:

1. Are there any counterexamples that only double object holds?
(in zero context, i.e. '?Mary threw John the ball. But he wasn't
looking' does not count).

2. As I know, this asymmetric shift relation holds true of Chinese
corresponding opposition.
    I would like to know to what extent this asymmetry is universal.
Specifically, how does your native language behave in this aspect?

If responses are sufficient to draw a conclusion, I will make a
summary.

Thanks!
Bingfu LU
USC

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-9-641