10.1838, Sum: 10.1801 Eng.Complementizer

LINGUIST Network linguist at linguistlist.org
Wed Dec 1 13:41:03 UTC 1999


LINGUIST List:  Vol-10-1838. Wed Dec 1 1999. ISSN: 1068-4875.

Subject: 10.1838, Sum: 10.1801 Eng.Complementizer

Moderators: Anthony Rodrigues Aristar: Wayne State U.<aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Dry: Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at linguistlist.org>
            Andrew Carnie: U. of Arizona <carnie at linguistlist.org>

Reviews: Andrew Carnie: U. of Arizona <carnie at linguistlist.org>

Associate Editors:  Martin Jacobsen <marty at linguistlist.org>
                    Ljuba Veselinova <ljuba at linguistlist.org>
		    Scott Fults <scott at linguistlist.org>
		    Jody Huellmantel <jody at linguistlist.org>
		    Karen Milligan <karen at linguistlist.org>

Assistant Editors:  Lydia Grebenyova <lydia at linguistlist.org>
		    Naomi Ogasawara <naomi at linguistlist.org>
		    James Yuells <james at linguistlist.org>

Software development: John H. Remmers <remmers at emunix.emich.edu>
                      Chris Brown <chris at linguistlist.org>
                      Qian Liao <qian at linguistlist.org>

Home Page:  http://linguistlist.org/


Editor for this issue: Naomi Ogasawara <naomi at linguistlist.org>

=================================Directory=================================

1)
Date:  Wed, 01 Dec 1999 09:57:13 +0000
From:  "Neil.Salmond" <Neil.Salmond at durham.ac.uk>
Subject:  Sum: Eng.Complementizer

-------------------------------- Message 1 -------------------------------

Date:  Wed, 01 Dec 1999 09:57:13 +0000
From:  "Neil.Salmond" <Neil.Salmond at durham.ac.uk>
Subject:  Sum: Eng.Complementizer

Thanks for my many helpers.  Here's some of what they said:

Arne Martinus Lindstad <arnel at ilf.uio.no>
>>>
There is a new book out by Peter W. Culicover "Syntactic
Nuts" (Oxford University Press 1999), where he among other
things discusses the syntactic category of certain
complementisers and/or prepositions.
<<<

Anthea Fraser Gupta <a.f.gupta at leeds.ac.uk>
>>>
In many languages they [complementizers] are drawn from
other, more basic word classes.
(snip)
In the Indo-European languages in general the interrogative
words tend to be used as complementizers.
(snip)
In Old-English (as in other IE languages) there was a link
between pronouns and demonstratives.  In OE many
conjunctions were made up of
combinations of prepositions and demonstratives.  A good
book to read on the history of English in general is the one
by Pyles & Algeo, which also has an accompanying workbook
that explores some of these issues.
<<<

William Morris <wmorris at cs.ucsd.edu>
>>>
I highly recommend the following paper:

Dan Jackson (1998) The historical origins of the that-trace
effect. (0.9Megs) To appear in Linguistic Notes from La
Jolla, UCSD.

http://ling.ucsd.edu/~jackson/
<<<

Elly VanGeldern? <ellyvangelderen at asu.edu>
>>>
Complementizers typically derive (grammaticalize) from
determiners and prepositions.
<<<

Thanks again and have a very merry Christmas!
- Neil

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-10-1838



More information about the LINGUIST mailing list