10.1004, Qs: Speech Science & L2, Negation

[LINGUIST Network]

LINGUIST List:  Vol-10-1004. Tue Jun 29 1999. ISSN: 1068-4875.

Subject: 10.1004, Qs: Speech Science & L2, Negation

Moderators: Anthony Rodrigues Aristar: Wayne State U.<aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Dry: Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at linguistlist.org>
            Andrew Carnie: U. of Arizona <carnie at linguistlist.org>

Reviews: Andrew Carnie: U. of Arizona <carnie at linguistlist.org>

Associate Editors:  Martin Jacobsen <marty at linguistlist.org>
                    Brett Churchill <brett at linguistlist.org>
                    Ljuba Veselinova <ljuba at linguistlist.org>

Assistant Editors:  Scott Fults <scott at linguistlist.org>
		    Jody Huellmantel <jody at linguistlist.org>
		    Karen Milligan <karen at linguistlist.org>

Software development: John H. Remmers <remmers at emunix.emich.edu>
                      Chris Brown <chris at linguistlist.org>

Home Page:  http://linguistlist.org/


Editor for this issue: Karen Milligan <karen at linguistlist.org>
 ==========================================================================

We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually
best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is
then  strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list.   This policy was
instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we
would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.

=================================Directory=================================

1)
Date:  Sun, 27 Jun 1999 21:49:07 EDT
From:  Cor9999 at aol.com
Subject:  speech science and L2

2)
Date:  Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:40:10 +0100
From:  Pierre Larrivee
Subject:  Not nobody! Not nohow!

-------------------------------- Message 1 -------------------------------

Date:  Sun, 27 Jun 1999 21:49:07 EDT
From:  Cor9999 at aol.com
Subject:  speech science and L2

I am a grad student in linguistics at West Virginia University.  I am about
to begin research for my thesis on the application of speech science
techniques to second language learning and was wondering if I could find a
few pointers from all of you on the list.
I am interested in determining what it is in the speech signal that triggers
the perception of a foreign accent and what possible techniques could be used
to change these elements of nonstandard pronunciations.  I think that knowing
exactly what it is that distinguishes "foreign" speech from "different but
still native" speech could be very useful for language teachers and also for
monolingual speech therapists who are often at a loss for what to do with
foreign clients.  For example, if certain suprasegmental errors were more
likely to trigger the perception of accentedness in a given language than
other segments or suprasegments, it would make sense to concentrate on those
suprasegments first or most intensly.
Specifically, I will work with Spanish speakers with English as a second
language (or vice versa).  I plan on using spectrographic analysis and such
to avoid the subjectivity and inaccuracies of phonetic transcriptions.
Spectrographic analysis also creates an opportunity to give visual feedback
to the learner which may prove very useful in changing their pronunciation
habits.

I would be grateful for any information or suggestions any one has to offer
on this topic.  I will post a summary if I receive sufficient responses.
Thanks!
Cori Kropf, WVU


-------------------------------- Message 2 -------------------------------

Date:  Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:40:10 +0100
From:  Pierre Larrivee
Subject:  Not nobody! Not nohow!

Dear Colleagues,

As I watched The Wizard of Oz yesterday, I noticed for the first time the
use  of the double negation (with concord interpretation) sequence "Not
nobody! Not nohow!" used by the guard of Oz's castle to reinforce a
statement to the effect that the magician will not be seeing anybody. Now,
is this only a jocular use, or (as I suspect) does this sequence reflect a
possible use in some social or geographical variety of American (or other,
for that matter) English? And if it is attested, what about "Not nobody
will be received", "He will receive not nobody", or "He will not receive
nobody" (single negation intended in all cases) in the same varieties? I
would be very grateful if some of you were so kind as to be willing to
enlighten me on this.

Pierre Larrivee


Dr. Pierre Larrivee

Lecturer in French Linguistics
French Language Coordinator

School of Languages and European Studies
Aston University
Aston Triangle
Birmingham B4 7ET
United Kingdom

Tel +44 (0)121 359 3611 ext. 5454
Fax +44 (0)121 359 6153
Web http://www.les.aston.ac.uk/staff/pl.html

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-10-1004