10.1649, Disc: New Re: Cyber-linguistic Questions

[LINGUIST Network]

LINGUIST List:  Vol-10-1649. Sun Oct 31 1999. ISSN: 1068-4875.

Subject: 10.1649, Disc: New Re: Cyber-linguistic Questions

Moderators: Anthony Rodrigues Aristar: Wayne State U.<aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Dry: Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at linguistlist.org>
            Andrew Carnie: U. of Arizona <carnie at linguistlist.org>

Reviews: Andrew Carnie: U. of Arizona <carnie at linguistlist.org>

Associate Editors:  Martin Jacobsen <marty at linguistlist.org>
                    Ljuba Veselinova <ljuba at linguistlist.org>
		    Scott Fults <scott at linguistlist.org>
		    Jody Huellmantel <jody at linguistlist.org>
		    Karen Milligan <karen at linguistlist.org>

Assistant Editors:  Lydia Grebenyova <lydia at linguistlist.org>
		    Naomi Ogasawara <naomi at linguistlist.org>
		    James Yuells <james at linguistlist.org>

Software development: John H. Remmers <remmers at emunix.emich.edu>
                      Chris Brown <chris at linguistlist.org>
                      Qian Liao <qian at linguistlist.org>

Home Page:  http://linguistlist.org/


Editor for this issue: Karen Milligan <karen at linguistlist.org>

=================================Directory=================================

1)
Date:  Thu, 28 Oct 1999 14:09:36 -0400
From:  Michael McHale <mchale at twcny.rr.com>
Subject:  Cyber-linguistic Questions

-------------------------------- Message 1 -------------------------------

Date:  Thu, 28 Oct 1999 14:09:36 -0400
From:  Michael McHale <mchale at twcny.rr.com>
Subject:  Cyber-linguistic Questions

Larry Chong has raised some interesting questions here. My expertise is
in
email so I was pleased to see the viewpoint from an IRC perspective.

> 1. Why netizns love to use as many acronyms as they could?
> Ex) By the way --->BTW
>
> ****the tendency toward the use of reduced forms may reflect the
> importance of minimizing the effort required to communicate one's
message.
> The pace of communicative exchange in such an environment is pretty
rapid,
> especially among those who are "veteran" users and who feel they
belong to
> an online community or communities, such as a an IRC channel.
>
> **** to show their strong ties....
>         linguistic economy
>
>
> 2. Why it occurs all over the sentences?
> Ex) How are you? -->How R U?
>
> This particular example is a good example of the minimal effort
factor.
> Since the pronunciation of the letters 'R' and 'U' are equivalent to
the
> words 'are' and 'you', then use of the letters would allow one to get
the
> same message across with only two keystrokes instead of six. This may
not
> seem like that big a difference, but when one is talking to several
people
> in the same channel or separately, things tend to become very
fast-paced.
> So anything that can be done to "say more with less" is definitely a
plus.

If this analysis is correct then we should expect shifts in spelling as
well
from good -> gud,
know -> kno,
...
Perhaps the simplification of English spelling is finally under way.

The fascinating part for me is that the culture of IRC effects the
culture of email which in turn effects the culture of advertising
which effects everybody's language.  I would expect the diachronic
linguists would find this highly volitile, rapidly changing language
use of particular interest.  Professor Chong is currect when he said,
"I am sure that the more time netizens spend on line(CMC), the more
topics we will have to research and resolve".

Michael L. McHale
Senior Research Scientist
MNIS TextWise Labs

mchale at textwise.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-10-1649