11.2745, Sum: Use of Address Forms

Mon Dec 18 21:39:53 UTC 2000

LINGUIST List:  Vol-11-2745. Mon Dec 18 2000. ISSN: 1068-4875.

Subject: 11.2745, Sum: Use of Address Forms

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Wayne State U.<aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Dry, Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at linguistlist.org>
            Andrew Carnie, U. of Arizona <carnie at linguistlist.org>

Reviews: Andrew Carnie: U. of Arizona <carnie at linguistlist.org>

Editors: Karen Milligan, Wayne State U. <karen at linguistlist.org>
         Michael Appleby, E. Michigan U. <michael at linguistlist.org>
         Rob Beltz, E. Michigan U. <rob at linguistlist.org>
         Lydia Grebenyova, E. Michigan U. <lydia at linguistlist.org>
         Jody Huellmantel, Wayne State U. <jody at linguistlist.org>
         Marie Klopfenstein, Wayne State U. <marie at linguistlist.org>
	 Naomi Ogasawara, E. Michigan U. <naomi at linguistlist.org>
	 James Yuells, Wayne State U. <james at linguistlist.org>
         Ljuba Veselinova, Stockholm U. <ljuba at linguistlist.org>

Software: John Remmers, E. Michigan U. <remmers at emunix.emich.edu>
          Gayathri Sriram, E. Michigan U. <gayatri at linguistlist.org>

Home Page:  http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, Wayne
State University, and donations from subscribers and publishers.

Editor for this issue: Marie Klopfenstein <marie at linguistlist.org>

=================================Directory=================================

1)
Date:  Mon, 18 Dec 2000 12:28:50 -0000
From:  "Yuko Taniguchi" <yuko_t at ga3.so-net.ne.jp>
Subject:  survey on address forms

-------------------------------- Message 1 -------------------------------

Date:  Mon, 18 Dec 2000 12:28:50 -0000
From:  "Yuko Taniguchi" <yuko_t at ga3.so-net.ne.jp>
Subject:  survey on address forms

I posted an inquiry for the survey on address forms to the Linguist List on 28 of October
2000(11.2333). Below is the summary of the survey I would like to share;

Yuko Taniguchi
- ------------

Summary of the Survey

I posted an inquiry for the survey on address forms to the Linguist List on 28 of October
2000(11.2333). I thank the following people who responded to my inquiry and returned the
survey I sent to them. All of them gave me very helpful examples and comments on address
forms in many aspects.

E. Bashir
Claire Bowern
Daniel Buncic
Karen Courtenay
Pilar Garcia-Donoso
John Dunnion
Burgel Rosa Maria Faehndrich
Anna Fenyvesi
Mai Kuha
James B. Long
Katalin MÃ¡dy
Fiona Macarthur Purdon
Dominique Lagorgette
Antonia Rothmayr
Andrew Wilcox
Margaret E. Winters
(The names above correspond to how they were actually written in their e-mail messages â
Euro" some of them put surnames first, whereas others put given names first.)

The survey included questions: (1) what address forms are used between teachers and
students and between students and students in classroom and (2) By what address forms the respondents are addressed in various situations in daily life.

In the survey I use the terms first name (FN) and last name (LN) following studies
previously done in this topic. However, this caused confusion to some respondents. In
some languages including Chinese, Hungarian, Korean and Japanese (my L1), people put what
is generally called a âEuro~last nameâEuro(tm) before a âEuro~first nameâEuro(tm).
Therefore, I will use a given name (GN) and a surname (SN) hereafter instead of a first
name and a last name in this summary. The following is a summary of the survey.

I. Address forms carry cultural information

The respondents provided various examples in different linguistic environments. The
examples given by the respondents include English (UK, US, Ireland, Australia), German
(Austria, Germany), Spanish (Spain, Ecuador), French, Greek, Hungarian, Urdu, Swahili,
Bambara, Ibo, Japanese, Russian, Turkish and an Australian Aboriginal Language. All the
respondents have used one or more of the above languages in daily life

As you can see from my question (1) above, the survey was originally intended to find out
the uses of address form in classroom. However, some respondents have suggested that it
would be difficult to define âEuro~classroomâEuro(tm) context in terms of linguistic
environment âEuro" There were several instances in which Language A is chosen as the
language of instruction (even in non-language classes) in an environment where Language B
is used.

The responses have also shown that languages of address forms would not always correspond
to the linguistic environment where the address forms are used. There was an example of a
Hungarian woman who is addressed by her father with a Hungarian diminutive form of her
name in Hungary but her mother (she is a Russian) addresses her by a Russian diminutive
form.

This flexibility of the address form use is partly due to the fact that address forms are
single units in interaction. The small units can be more easily used in different
linguistic environment. In other words, this flexibility is a reason why address forms
carry certain cultural information even within a different linguistic environment.

In addition, address forms, as single units in interaction, can be even easily modified
as `hybrid formsâEuro(tm). Particularly it appears in the responses concerning foreign
language learners. A respondent said that English learners of Spanish speakers would use
title-GN (e.g., `Miss-AnneâEuro(tm)) when they address teachers who are native English
speakers: This seems to result from Spanish speakerâEuro(tm)s L1 address forms
(Don/Dona-GN), which reinterprets the use of Miss/Mrs/Mr. There was also a similar
example in Greek.

II. The most commonly used address forms: Given names

Given names are the single most commonly used address forms appeared across languages (or
I may say across cultures) in the responses. Although the way in which given names are
used in each language varies, there is a general tendency of how given names are used:
(1) when a speaker and a hearer have known each other and formality required between them
is relatively little or (2) when a speaker is in a higher position (in terms of
social/academic order or age difference) than a hearer so that the speaker can choose an
option of address forms (in this case GN) for the hearer more freely.

III. Address forms in classroom
A. Address form avoidance

Address form avoidance is one feature of address form use, and several respondents have
provided such examples. In a lecture class where class size is big, the teacher would
rarely address students by name (Computer science class--Ireland). As teachersâEuro(tm)
address form avoidance strategy, the teachers would avoid the use of address forms by
saying, âEurooe`Sorry, I donâEuro(tm)t know your name but could you tell meâEuro¦
âEuro(tm) or avoiding them completely saying `next pleaseâEuro(tm), or `You in the back
rowâEuro(tm) âEurooe(EFL class--Spain). As an example of studentsâEuro(tm) avoidance,
âEuroA couple of students âEuro¦ do not address me at all, âEuro¦. For instance, if they
raise their hand and are recognised, they will begin with `How doâEuro¦âEuro(tm) rather
than, `Jim, how doâEuro¦âEuro(tm)âEuro(ESL classroom-- US). As another example, the
undergraduate students (in the US) who did not ask what they should address the
instructors either avoided address forms or used Dr-SN or sometimes Mrs-SN, when they
call her on the phone (Linguistics class--US).

There are two facets in address form avoidance to teachers in English: (1) the students
are not sure which address form (Dr. Professor, Mr. Mrs) is appropriate to a particular
teacher as his/her personal information, e.g., whether s/he holds a PhD degree or not, or
whether the teacher (female) is married or not, and (2) the students are not sure about
the appropriate distance they are supposed to keep to the teacher âEuro" how they should
assess the social relationships with their teachers.

B. Different address form use to the teachers

Cultural difference has been observed in the use of titles as address forms to the
teachers. The respondents have suggested that there is a significant contrast between
English and German, for example, in this respect. It should also be mentioned that some
variations are observed between different varieties of English (Australian vs. American).

1. English

An Australian respondent who is in the US stated; âEurooeIf the teacher is a professor
he/she will usually be called Prof X until he/she invites students to use his/her first
name (which usually happens fairly quickly). NB: professors have much higher status in
Australia than they do in the US; typically there will only be one or two professors in
each department.âEuro

Following are some examples of addressing teachers in German from Germany, German from
Austria, Hungarian, Greek, French from France and French from French classroom in Ecuador.

2. German  (Germany):
a. Herr (=Mr.)SN with Sie (the polite form of address)
b. Frau (=Mrs) SN with Sie

3. German (Austria):
a. âEurooeFrau ProfessorâEuro (Miss/ Mrs Professor-MALE)
b. With surname (optional): âEurooeFrau Professor SmithâEuro (Miss / Mrs Professor Smith)
However, the respondent has never heard âEurooeFrau ProfessorinâEuro
(Miss/Mrs Professor-FEMALE) for a female professor. Neither there is a distinction
between the form for a married woman and that for a single woman.
c. âEurooeHerr ProfessorâEuro (Mr Professor-MALE)
d. With surname (Optional): âEurooeHerr Professor SmithâEuro (Mr Professor-MALE Smith)

According to the respondent, âEurooethe term `professorâEuro(tm) is only used for
teachers in the kind of secondary school that leads to a final exam, which enables the
students to go to university. These teachers all have a degree from the university
(Professor Magister).âEuro The respondent stressed that academic addressing forms were
very important in Austria.

The respondent continued that for primary school teachers one would use âEurooeHerr
LehrerâEuro (Mr teacher-MALE), âEurooeFrau LehrerinâEuro (Miss / Mrs teacher-FEMALE), and
âEuro"as odd as it may seem- the respondent has also often heard âEurooeFrau LehrerâEuro
(Miss / Mrs teacher-MALE).

4. Hungarian:
In primary school, address forms for teachers are as follows; Christian (Given) name +
nÃ©ni (âEurooeauntâEuro) or bÃ¡csi (âEurooeuncleâEuro), or tanÃ¡r nÃ©ni/bÃ¡csi (teacher
aunt/uncle).They change to tanÃ¡rnÅ' (teacher-woman, meaning female teacher) or tanÃ¡r
Ãºr (teacher mister, meaning âEurooeMr. TeacherâEuro) in secondary school. While these
remain at university level, the form professzor asszony (professor (married-)woman
meaning Mrs. Professor, regardless whether she is married or not) or professzor Ãºr
(professor mister) are also utilised.

5. Greek
In Greek, âEurooeKyrieâEuro (=Mr/Sir : vocative of Kyrios = Mister, Lord) Also "Kyrie GN"
(the use of Kyrie with the first name is not deviant in Greek).

6. French (France)
A respondant tells the FFL students how to address her at the beginning as follows:
âEurooeMadameâEuro + âEurooevousâEuro (polite form) all the time during classes, whatever
language is used, and GN during the breaks, outside the classroom + âEurooetuâEuro forms.

7. French (Classroom in Ecuador)
A respondent gives an example from her FFL class:
She asks the students to address her by GN + either âEurooetuâEuro or âEurooevousâEuro.
Most students return to use GN + âEurovousâEuro.

***************************
Yuko TANIGUCHI
27 Redhatch Drive
Earley, Reading, Berkshire RG6 5QS
UK
E-mail. yuko_t at ga3.so-net.ne.jp
          y.taniguchi at reading.ac.uk
***************************

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-11-2745