11.1614, Disc: Writing and Speech

[The LINGUIST Network]

LINGUIST List:  Vol-11-1614. Tue Jul 25 2000. ISSN: 1068-4875.

Subject: 11.1614, Disc: Writing and Speech

Moderators: Anthony Rodrigues Aristar, Wayne State U.<aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Dry, Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at linguistlist.org>
            Andrew Carnie, U. of Arizona <carnie at linguistlist.org>

Reviews: Andrew Carnie: U. of Arizona <carnie at linguistlist.org>

Associate Editors:  Ljuba Veselinova, Stockholm U. <ljuba at linguistlist.org>
		    Scott Fults, E. Michigan U. <scott at linguistlist.org>
		    Jody Huellmantel, Wayne State U. <jody at linguistlist.org>
		    Karen Milligan, Wayne State U. <karen at linguistlist.org>

Assistant Editors:  Lydia Grebenyova, E. Michigan U. <lydia at linguistlist.org>
		    Naomi Ogasawara, E. Michigan U. <naomi at linguistlist.org>
		    James Yuells, Wayne State U. <james at linguistlist.org>

Software development: John Remmers, E. Michigan U. <remmers at emunix.emich.edu>
                      Sudheendra Adiga, Wayne State U. <sudhi at linguistlist.org>
                      Qian Liao, E. Michigan U. <qian at linguistlist.org>

Home Page:  http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded jointly by Eastern Michigan University,
Wayne State University, and donations from subscribers and publishers.


Editor for this issue: Karen Milligan <karen at linguistlist.org>

=================================Directory=================================

1)
Date:  Tue, 25 Jul 2000 10:31:36 +1000
From:  "Michael Lewis" <mlewis at laurel.ocs.mq.edu.au>
Subject:  RE: 11.1606, Disc: Writing and Speech

-------------------------------- Message 1 -------------------------------

Date:  Tue, 25 Jul 2000 10:31:36 +1000
From:  "Michael Lewis" <mlewis at laurel.ocs.mq.edu.au>
Subject:  RE: 11.1606, Disc: Writing and Speech

Colleagues,

Surely the genesis of spelling anomalies in English arises, above all, from
its "rich and varied" parenthood. At the time printing (with its potential
for the propagation of "standard" forms) developed, there were many
different varieties of spoken English (as, indeed, there still are). Who
doesn't recall Caxton's plaintive question about whether to use "eigies" or
"eyren" for what we now call "eggs"? (Apologies for my own deviant
spellings!)

Pyles & Algeo's The Origins and Development of the English Language
(Harcourt Brace, 3d edn, 1982) is, despite its age, a relevant and readable
treatment.

This doesn't really bear on Moonhawk's point about how long ago written
language diverged (evolved? declared independence?) from speech, except to
emphasise that -- until the development of radio -- there was no vehicle for
standardisation of spoken language. Written language, on the other hand,
began to be set in concrete (lead, anyway) about 550 years ago; while we can
trace many changes from Chaucer through Shakespeare and Dickens to Pynchon,
English orthography has changed comparatively little since Caxton.

Michael Lewis

Department of Linguistics
Macquarie University

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-11-1614