11.2550, Qs: Rhythm/Speech/Music, Prepositions/German

The LINGUIST Network linguist at linguistlist.org
Sun Nov 26 20:58:23 UTC 2000


LINGUIST List:  Vol-11-2550. Sun Nov 26 2000. ISSN: 1068-4875.

Subject: 11.2550, Qs: Rhythm/Speech/Music, Prepositions/German

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Wayne State U.<aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Dry, Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at linguistlist.org>
            Andrew Carnie, U. of Arizona <carnie at linguistlist.org>

Reviews: Andrew Carnie: U. of Arizona <carnie at linguistlist.org>

Editors: Karen Milligan, Wayne State U. <karen at linguistlist.org>
         Michael Appleby, E. Michigan U. <michael at linguistlist.org>
         Rob Beltz, E. Michigan U. <rob at linguistlist.org>
         Lydia Grebenyova, E. Michigan U. <lydia at linguistlist.org>
         Jody Huellmantel, Wayne State U. <jody at linguistlist.org>
         Marie Klopfenstein, Wayne State U. <marie at linguistlist.org>
	 Naomi Ogasawara, E. Michigan U. <naomi at linguistlist.org>
	 James Yuells, Wayne State U. <james at linguistlist.org>
         Ljuba Veselinova, Stockholm U. <ljuba at linguistlist.org>

Software: John Remmers, E. Michigan U. <remmers at emunix.emich.edu>
          Gayathri Sriram, E. Michigan U. <gayatri at linguistlist.org>

Home Page:  http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, Wayne
State University, and donations from subscribers and publishers.


Editor for this issue: Karen Milligan <karen at linguistlist.org>
 ==========================================================================

We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually
best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is
then  strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list.   This policy was
instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we
would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.

=================================Directory=================================

1)
Date:  Tue, 21 Nov 2000 14:00:09 -0800
From:  Aniruddh Patel <apatel at nsi.edu>
Subject:  rhythm in speech and music

2)
Date:  Mon, 20 Nov 2000 21:31:04 -0500
From:  "C.F. Hempelmann" <hempelma at purdue.edu>
Subject:  Stranded Prepositions in Northern German Dialects

-------------------------------- Message 1 -------------------------------

Date:  Tue, 21 Nov 2000 14:00:09 -0800
From:  Aniruddh Patel <apatel at nsi.edu>
Subject:  rhythm in speech and music

Dear List,

I'm looking for articles which examine the imprint of linguistic rhythm
on the instrumental music of a culture.

I am familiar with Brian J. Wenk's 1987 paper, "Just in time: on speech
rhythms in music", Linguistics 25:969-981.

I would be grateful for any suggestions for further papers along these
lines, especially empirical studies.

Thanks, and Happy Thanksgiving,

Ani Patel

-
Aniruddh D. Patel			
The Neurosciences Institute		
10640 John Jay Hopkins Drive
San Diego, CA 92121

Tel	858-626-2085
Fax	858-626-2099
Email	apatel at nsi.edu
Website	http://www.nsi.edu/users/patel


-------------------------------- Message 2 -------------------------------

Date:  Mon, 20 Nov 2000 21:31:04 -0500
From:  "C.F. Hempelmann" <hempelma at purdue.edu>
Subject:  Stranded Prepositions in Northern German Dialects



	
		
	Dear list-members,
	
	Being originally from Northern Germany and remembering being teased
	for it, I'd like to share any references on the following phenomenon.
	
	I am working on contracted prepositional pronouns, formed with
	"da(r)-" and prepositions "um," "ueber," "von," etc:
	darum (for that), darueber (over that), davon (of that), dafuer (for
	that), darunter (under that), darin/dadrin (in that), etc.
	
	When fronted, in standard German they are inseparable, while in
	certain dialects they are separable and the preposition is stranded,
	like in English
	
	1.  a.  Ich weiss nichts   davon.
	         I   know  nothing  that-of
	     b.  Davon weiss ich nichts t. (standard)
	     c.  Da weiss ich nichts von. (dialectal)
	
	2.  a.  Davon kann nicht die Rede sein.
	     b.  Es kann nicht die Rede davon sein.
	     c.  Da kann nicht die Rede von sein.
	     d.  Da kann nicht von die Rede sein.
	(Especially (2d) seems to be acceptable only very locally.)
	
	Summary will be posted.
	
	Thanks,
	Christian F. Hempelmann
	Interdepartmental Program in Linguistics
	Purdue University
	Heavilon Hall
	West Lafayette, IN 47907
	e-mail hempelma at purdue.edu

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-11-2550



More information about the LINGUIST mailing list