11.1879, Qs: Phrasal Quantification, Deletion/Epenthesis

The LINGUIST Network linguist at linguistlist.org
Thu Sep 7 18:43:51 UTC 2000


LINGUIST List:  Vol-11-1879. Thu Sep 7 2000. ISSN: 1068-4875.

Subject: 11.1879, Qs: Phrasal Quantification, Deletion/Epenthesis

Moderators: Anthony Rodrigues Aristar, Wayne State U.<aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Dry, Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at linguistlist.org>
            Andrew Carnie, U. of Arizona <carnie at linguistlist.org>

Reviews: Andrew Carnie: U. of Arizona <carnie at linguistlist.org>

Associate Editors:  Ljuba Veselinova, Stockholm U. <ljuba at linguistlist.org>
		    Scott Fults, E. Michigan U. <scott at linguistlist.org>
		    Jody Huellmantel, Wayne State U. <jody at linguistlist.org>
		    Karen Milligan, Wayne State U. <karen at linguistlist.org>

Assistant Editors:  Lydia Grebenyova, E. Michigan U. <lydia at linguistlist.org>
		    Naomi Ogasawara, E. Michigan U. <naomi at linguistlist.org>
		    James Yuells, Wayne State U. <james at linguistlist.org>

Software development: John Remmers, E. Michigan U. <remmers at emunix.emich.edu>
                      Sudheendra Adiga, Wayne State U. <sudhi at linguistlist.org>
                      Qian Liao, E. Michigan U. <qian at linguistlist.org>

Home Page:  http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded jointly by Eastern Michigan University,
Wayne State University, and donations from subscribers and publishers.


Editor for this issue: Karen Milligan <karen at linguistlist.org>
 ==========================================================================

We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually
best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is
then  strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list.   This policy was
instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we
would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.

=================================Directory=================================

1)
Date:  Thu, 7 Sep 2000 09:04:44 +0100
From:  Torodd Kinn <torodd.kinn at lili.uib.no>
Subject:  Phrasal quantification

2)
Date:  Wed, 06 Sep 2000 12:24:38 -0400
From:  Claire Bowern <bowern at fas.harvard.edu>
Subject:  Linguist seeking Language ...

-------------------------------- Message 1 -------------------------------

Date:  Thu, 7 Sep 2000 09:04:44 +0100
From:  Torodd Kinn <torodd.kinn at lili.uib.no>
Subject:  Phrasal quantification



Dear linguists,

I am looking for works on phrasal quantification.
English examples are "three bottles of wine" and "a lot of
people". I am particularly interested in those Germanic
languages where usually no preposition is used (the
Scandinavian ones, German, Dutch ...), but also English. In
German and Norwegian we find phrases like:

	drei Flaschen Wein / tre flasker vin
	eine Menge Menschen / ei mengd menneske

It is well known that both the first and the second noun
exhibit head properties, and an analysis based on
grammatical ambiguity has been proposed by Lars-Olof
Delsing in a principles-and-parameters framework.

I would be grateful for references to other analyses of
these constructions, especially DIACHRONIC, but also
synchronic ones. I'm working in cognitive linguistics
myself, but approaches of all persuasions are welcome.

If anyone expresses an interest, I'll post a summary of
references.

Thanks,

Torodd Kinn


-------------------------------- Message 2 -------------------------------

Date:  Wed, 06 Sep 2000 12:24:38 -0400
From:  Claire Bowern <bowern at fas.harvard.edu>
Subject:  Linguist seeking Language ...

		
		
I'm a linguist looking to meet a language that
		
1. has both prefixes and suffixes
2. does morphophonemic stuff to these affixes (eg doesn't allow vowels in
hiatus, or doesn't allow consonant clusters)
3. deletes affix material in both prefixes and suffixes (eg, Ci-aRoot >
CaRoot, Roota- iC > RootaC or the equivalent)
or
4. deletes root material at the expense of prefixes and suffixes (eg,
Ci-aRoot > CiRoot, Roota-iC > RootiC). This may involve deleting the entire
root.
		
So, my dream language is an exception to the often supposed rule that
deletion/epenthesis is uni-directional (as in eg Ito (1986)).  All
interested languages should reply to me at bowern at fas.harvard.edu.
		
Claire Bowern
		
_________________________________
Department of Linguistics
Harvard University
305 Boylston Hall
Cambridge  MA 02138
ph: (+1) 617-547-3521
fax: (+1) 617-496-4447
http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~lingdept/
http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~bowern/
		
	

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-11-1879



More information about the LINGUIST mailing list