11.1982, Qs: VARBRUL/Salient Factors, MT Evaluations

The LINGUIST Network linguist at linguistlist.org
Wed Sep 20 02:42:14 UTC 2000


LINGUIST List:  Vol-11-1982. Tue Sep 19 2000. ISSN: 1068-4875.

Subject: 11.1982, Qs: VARBRUL/Salient Factors, MT Evaluations

Moderators: Anthony Rodrigues Aristar, Wayne State U.<aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Dry, Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at linguistlist.org>
            Andrew Carnie, U. of Arizona <carnie at linguistlist.org>

Reviews: Andrew Carnie: U. of Arizona <carnie at linguistlist.org>

Associate Editors:  Ljuba Veselinova, Stockholm U. <ljuba at linguistlist.org>
		    Scott Fults, E. Michigan U. <scott at linguistlist.org>
		    Jody Huellmantel, Wayne State U. <jody at linguistlist.org>
		    Karen Milligan, Wayne State U. <karen at linguistlist.org>

Assistant Editors:  Lydia Grebenyova, E. Michigan U. <lydia at linguistlist.org>
		    Naomi Ogasawara, E. Michigan U. <naomi at linguistlist.org>
		    James Yuells, Wayne State U. <james at linguistlist.org>

Software development: John Remmers, E. Michigan U. <remmers at emunix.emich.edu>
                      Sudheendra Adiga, Wayne State U. <sudhi at linguistlist.org>
                      Qian Liao, E. Michigan U. <qian at linguistlist.org>

Home Page:  http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded jointly by Eastern Michigan University,
Wayne State University, and donations from subscribers and publishers.


Editor for this issue: Karen Milligan <karen at linguistlist.org>
 ==========================================================================

We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually
best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is
then  strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list.   This policy was
instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we
would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.

=================================Directory=================================

1)
Date:  Tue, 19 Sep 2000 12:38:03 +0800 (CST)
From:  "gill cai" <caiyyx at 163.net>
Subject:  Salient factors using the VARBRUL program

2)
Date:  Tue, 19 Sep 2000 15:24:05 +0200
From:  "Tim Read" <tread at ieec.uned.es>
Subject:  Machine translation evaluations wanted

-------------------------------- Message 1 -------------------------------

Date:  Tue, 19 Sep 2000 12:38:03 +0800 (CST)
From:  "gill cai" <caiyyx at 163.net>
Subject:  Salient factors using the VARBRUL program


My name is Cai Jinting, working at my PhD dissertation at present in
China. As a cross-sectional study, this dissertation intends to
uncover the relative contributions of some factors to the variations
of tense and aspect in the English interlanguage of Chinese-speaking
college students. The primary instrument in analyzing the data is
VARBRUL program. According to its requirements, all the possible
factors influencing the choice of tense and aspect in learner English
should be taken into account, though some of them may be deleted
during the analyzing process. I have considered some factors,
including verb salience, lexical aspect, temporal adverbial,
proficiency and gender, but there may be others I neglected but are
important. Therefore I seek helps from linguists all around the world.
Could any linguist inform me other possible factors? Are my factors
potentially valid? You are extremely welcome if you can also offer
some information on the sources where I can find evidence for their
effect in SLA.





- ---------------------------------------------


-------------------------------- Message 2 -------------------------------

Date:  Tue, 19 Sep 2000 15:24:05 +0200
From:  "Tim Read" <tread at ieec.uned.es>
Subject:  Machine translation evaluations wanted

I am working on a project where we want to include a (probably
commercial) machine translation system with other software we are
developing to enable users to move materials between languages. Before
integrating such a thing with what we have we are interested in
finding any evaluations that have made between the common machine
translation systems that are available, which works best in which
conditions, etc. Does anyone know where I can find such information?

Many thanks in advance.

Tim Read
tread at ieec.uned.es

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-11-1982



More information about the LINGUIST mailing list