12.2753, Sum: Trills and Second Language Accent

Sat Nov 3 23:46:51 UTC 2001

LINGUIST List:  Vol-12-2753. Sat Nov 3 2001. ISSN: 1068-4875.

Subject: 12.2753, Sum: Trills and Second Language Accent

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Wayne State U.<aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Dry, Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at linguistlist.org>
            Andrew Carnie, U. of Arizona <carnie at linguistlist.org>

Reviews (reviews at linguistlist.org):
	Simin Karimi, U. of Arizona
	Terence Langendoen, U. of Arizona

Editors (linguist at linguistlist.org):
	Karen Milligan, WSU 		Naomi Ogasawara, EMU
	Jody Huellmantel, WSU		James Yuells, WSU
	Michael Appleby, EMU		Marie Klopfenstein, WSU
	Ljuba Veselinova, Stockholm U.	Heather Taylor-Loring, EMU
	Dina Kapetangianni, EMU		Richard Harvey, EMU
	Karolina Owczarzak, EMU		Renee Galvis, WSU

Software: John Remmers, E. Michigan U. <remmers at emunix.emich.edu>
          Gayathri Sriram, E. Michigan U. <gayatri at linguistlist.org>

Home Page:  http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, Wayne
State University, and donations from subscribers and publishers.

Editor for this issue: Marie Klopfenstein <marie at linguistlist.org>

=================================Directory=================================

1)
Date:  Sat, 3 Nov 2001 18:45:36 +0800
From:  "Karen S. Chung" <karchung at ccms.ntu.edu.tw>
Subject:  Trills and L2 accent

-------------------------------- Message 1 -------------------------------

Date:  Sat, 3 Nov 2001 18:45:36 +0800
From:  "Karen S. Chung" <karchung at ccms.ntu.edu.tw>
Subject:  Trills and L2 accent

    Here is the summary on (1) alveolar and uvular trills as separate
phonemes, and (2) accents in L2 learners, by Mia Shen, a student in my
Phonetics II class at National Taiwan University.

    Karen Steffen Chung
    karchung at ccms.ntu.edu.tw
    http://ccms.ntu.edu.tw/~karchung

    I asked two questions:

    (1) Are there languages in which the alveolar trill and uvular trill
co-occur as separate phonemes?

    (2) Are people who learn a foreign language after puberty necessarily
doomed to having a foreign accent due to influence from their mother tongue?

        I am grateful to the following linguists for their responses and
excellent data:

    Eleonora Deak                 <dacsth-eastling at nt-tech.com.au>
    Angus B. Grieve-Smith    <grvsmth at unm.edu>
    Michael Johnstone           <mjj1000 at hermes.cam.ac.uk>
    Jeff Lilly                           <jlilly at Primus.com>
    Robert Orr                        <colkitto at sprint.ca>
    Johannes Reese                <reesej at uni-muenster.de>
    Donald F. Reindl              <dreindl at indiana.edu>
    Harold F. Schiffman         <haroldfs at ccat.sas.upenn.edu>
    Koen Sebregts                  <Koen.Sebregts at Let.uu.nl>
    Larry Trask                      <larryt at cogs.susx.ac.uk>
    Josefina Vitale                  <lvitale at vaf.com.ar>
    Colin Whiteley                 <cwhiteley at tycoint.com>
    Tomasz Wisniewski         <tomwisn at yahoo.com>

    and

    Karen S. Chung, my phonetics teacher, who helped me edit
                this summary
                <karchung at ccms.ntu.edu.tw>  and
    Hendrik Dammerboer, who first suggested the question about trills
                <tongguk at yahoo.com>

    Replies to the first question, on whether any language contrasts
alveolar and uvular trills, were as follows:

    1. Three of the replies (Koen Sebregts, Larry Trask, Michael Johnstone)
cited Ladefoged and Maddieson's _The Sounds of World's Languages_, which
claims [p. 227] that some older speakers of Eastern dialects of Occitan may
maintain such a contrast; but that there probably is no other living
language which uses both alveolar and uvular trills as separate phonemes.

    2. Robert Orr cited Richard Runge's _The Pronunciation of Proto-Germanic
R_ (exact reference not given) for a possible example; I was not able to
follow up on this reference.

    3. Johannes Reese suggested that European Portuguese contrasts a uvular
trill (the double r) with the short r, which is alveolar.

    Hendrik Dammerboer, the originator of the question, questions whether
the double r is really a uvular trill, or a uvular or velar fricative. In
the Brazilian Portuguese of Rio de Janeiro, he says, the long r becomes a
velar fricative, and in the variety of Sao Paulo the friction disappears and
long r is pronounced as h like in Rio [hi:u] The short r is a short alveolar
trill and may be pronounced as a tap. The long r includes r at the beginning
of a word, r after n, l, s, and rr, which occurs only between vowels. Short
r is r in all other positions. Both long r (written rr) or short r may occur
intervocalically: _carro_ 'car' vs. _caro_ 'expensive'.

    Colin Whiteley also cited Brazilian Portuguese in which, he says, single
r's, except in word-initial position, are alveolar taps, as in Spanish.
Double r's and initial r's are generally unvoiced fricatives or
approximants, sometimes taps or light trills. The point of articulation
varies according to the degree of openness of the following vowel, from
uvular ("falar") all the way forward to palatal ("rio"). The utterance
final -r varies from mute to unvoiced uvular to alveolar tap.

    4. According to Donald Reindl, Chechen is a language in which the
alveolar trill (written as "r" in Cyrillic orthography) and uvular trill
(written as "gI" in Cyrillic orthography) co-occur as separate phonemes.

    5. From Tomasz Wisniewski: Some Arabic and Georgian speakers trill
uvular fricatives (transcribed gh), so Arabic and Georgian have the two
kinds of trills as separate phonemes for some people.

    6. From Harold Schiffman: The Machwaya dialect of Romany ('Gypsy')
contrasts an alveolar tap - not a trill- with a uvular /r/, also not a
trill, but a more fricative [(upside-down) R] like German. One of a few
minimal pairs is [rom] (alveolar) 'Rome' vs. [rhom] (the orthography to
represent [(upside down) R] 'a Gypsy man'.

******************************************************************

   There was considerable consensus regarding the second question, about
whether it is possible for an L2 learner to speak without a foreign accent
in their new language. Angus B. Grieve-Smith e-mailed me his paper entitled
"Foundations for 'Sound Houses'", in which he asserts that it is difficult
to add new varieties to our repertoire after the 'critical period', but
there
are a few exceptional people who can pick up new varieties in relatively
short periods of time. The effect of motivation in learning is significant,
he says. If learners have a strong desire to fit in, they are likely to pick
up more nativelike speech. However, motivation alone is not always enough to
overcome the critical period effect. Not everyone is an 'exceptional
acquirer', i.e. someone with unusually accurate mental representations of
images and sounds, or unusual speed in recognizing and manipulating
patterns.

    Koen Sebregts pointed me to the work of Susan Gass and Larry Selinker.

    The other replies mostly asserted that people who learn a foreign
language after puberty don't necessarily have to be doomed to speaking with
a foreign accent due to L1 influence. Success depends on an individual's
motivation to assimilate, and on their aptitude and attitude, confirming
Grieve-Smith's views above.

    Mia Shen

    Fourth-year student,
    Departments of Foreign Languages
        & Literatures  and
        International Business
    National Taiwan University
    jaywalker at mail2000.com.tw

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-12-2753