12.2854, Review: Fischer & Nanny, The Motivated Sign, vol. 2

LINGUIST List linguist at linguistlist.org
Wed Nov 14 05:03:35 UTC 2001


LINGUIST List:  Vol-12-2854. Wed Nov 14 2001. ISSN: 1068-4875.

Subject: 12.2854, Review: Fischer & Nanny, The Motivated Sign, vol. 2

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Wayne State U.<aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Dry, Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at linguistlist.org>
            Andrew Carnie, U. of Arizona <carnie at linguistlist.org>

Reviews (reviews at linguistlist.org):
	Simin Karimi, U. of Arizona
	Terence Langendoen, U. of Arizona

Editors (linguist at linguistlist.org):
	Karen Milligan, WSU 		Naomi Ogasawara, EMU
	Jody Huellmantel, WSU		James Yuells, WSU
	Michael Appleby, EMU		Marie Klopfenstein, WSU
	Ljuba Veselinova, Stockholm U.	Heather Taylor-Loring, EMU
	Dina Kapetangianni, EMU		Richard Harvey, EMU
	Karolina Owczarzak, EMU		Renee Galvis, WSU

Software: John Remmers, E. Michigan U. <remmers at emunix.emich.edu>
          Gayathri Sriram, E. Michigan U. <gayatri at linguistlist.org>

Home Page:  http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, Wayne
State University, and donations from subscribers and publishers.



Editor for this issue: Terence Langendoen <terry at linguistlist.org>
 ==========================================================================
What follows is another discussion note contributed to our Book Discussion
Forum.  We expect these discussions to be informal and interactive; and
the author of the book discussed is cordially invited to join in.

If you are interested in leading a book discussion, look for books
announced on LINGUIST as "available for discussion."  (This means that
the publisher has sent us a review copy.)  Then contact Simin Karimi at
     simin at linguistlist.org or Terry Langendoen at terry at linguistlist.org.
<p>
Subscribe to Blackwell's LL+ at http://www.linguistlistplus.com/ and donate 20% of your subscription to LINGUIST! You get 30% off on Blackwells books, and free shipping and postage!


=================================Directory=================================

1)
Date:  Sun, 28 Oct 2001 11:45:19 EST
From:  Oana JAN <Oanagu at aol.com>
Subject:  review of Fischer and Nänny, The Motivated Sign, vol. 2.

-------------------------------- Message 1 -------------------------------

Date:  Sun, 28 Oct 2001 11:45:19 EST
From:  Oana JAN <Oanagu at aol.com>
Subject:  review of Fischer and Nänny, The Motivated Sign, vol. 2.

Fischer, Olga, and Max Nänny, ed. (2001) The Motivated Sign: Iconicity
in Language and Literature 2. John Benjamins Publishing Company,
xiv+387pp, hardback ISBN 1-58811-003-6 (US), 90-272-2574-5 (Europe),
$100.00.

Oana Jan, University of Rouen, France

SYNOPSIS
This volume collects seventeen articles given at the second
international and interdisciplinary symposium on Iconicity in Language
and Literature held in Amsterdam in 1999. It is the sequel to Form
Miming Meaning: Iconicity in Language and Literature (Benjamins 1999),
which gathered papers offered at the first conference on iconicity held
in Zurich in 1997.

The Introduction
As the editors show in their 'Introduction' to The Motivated Sign, the
purpose of both conferences was not primarily of a theoretical nature.
Although semiotic, linguistic and literary theory had an important role
to play, the symposia and the papers aimed mainly at challenging
"Saussure's dogma of arbitrariness" - as Roman Jakobson put it (1960) -
through case studies showing how the iconicity works on all levels of
language in literary texts and in all kinds of verbal discourse.

They encourage the reader to report to the 'Introduction' to Form
Miming Meaning (pp. xv-xxxiv) for an explanation of what they and the
authors of the papers understand by the term "iconicity". The reader
will also find there (pp. xxff.) the criteria that allow a
differentiation between the man types of iconicity, especially the
distinction  between "imagic" and "diagrammatic" iconicity. A further
differentiation is introduced by Winfried Nöth in The Motivated Sign
between "exophoric" and "endophoric" iconicity, two concepts that some
other contributors used in their articles.

The editors take the time to illustrate some iconic uses of language by
means of an example, namely Julius Caesar's famous phrase veni, vidi,
vici. They use this phrase as a pretext to review a number of theories
and approaches in language iconicity theory. The conclusion of this
demonstration is that iconicity has it's real place in the theory of
language. They show that although the iconic features occur in a
medium, namely language, whose sign system is basically arbitrary,
iconicity is definitely an important feature of literature, especially
poetry.

A large part of the 'Introduction' consists of the detailed
presentation of the seventeen articles of the volume, grouped in five
parts. Part I - General contains papers of a more theoretical or
general nature by Winfried Nöth, John J. White and William J.
Herlofsky. Part II - Sounds and Beyond includes three articles by Piotr
Sadowsky, Ralf Norrman and Earl R. Anderson on iconically motivated
sounds and onomatopoeia. Part III - Visual iconicity and the use of
images deals with iconicity on the visual, especially the graphemic
level, assembling the essays of Anne C. Henry, Max Nänny, Robbie H. Goh
and Loretta Innocenti. Part IV - Iconicity in grammatical structures,
is especially interested in how far conventional word order may have an
iconic background or be manipulated so the it becomes iconically
meaningful. It contains the contributions of C. Jac Conradie, Olga
Fischer, Frank Jansen and Leo Lentz and that of Jean-Jacques Lecercle.
Part V - Iconicity in textual structures, is related with Part IV in
that they both deal with textual structure. In Part V the emphasis is
on structure in literary texts, illustrated by Wolfgang G. Muller,
Werner Wolf and Christina Ljungberg.

An encouragement for further studies into the motivated sign in
language and literature closes the 'Introduction', followed by a series
of notes and bibliographical references.

Part I  - General
The first article of this section, Winfried Nöth's 'Semiotic
foundations of iconicity in language and literature', is the only
purely semiotic study of this collection. In his essay, the author
begins by drawing the reader's attention on some facts in semiotic
theory. He reminds us that Peirce's teory of signs is triadic and not
dichotomic as often assumed, and that iconicity scales from pure or
genuine icons to hypo-icons. Nöth's original contribution is the
distinction he operates between 'exophoric' and 'endophoric' iconicity,
the latter standing for 'form miming form'.

The second article of Part I, 'The semiotics of the mise-en-abîme' by
John White, is an historical investigation on this particular literary
device. He discusses, ranging through American, French and German
literature, whether the mise en abîme may be seen as an example of
iconicity. In his conclusion, he summarises the variety of functions of
the device, from didactic, prophetic and cognitive to mystifying and
magical.

In his article Good probes : Icons, anaphors and the evolution of
language, William J. Herlofsky draws a possible scenario for the
evolution of language from a pre-symbolic system to a system which
gradually made more and more use of arbitrary grammatical signs. He
uses Chomsky's theory of Binding Principles to show how anaphora and
referential expressions could have arisen from real-world-space
referential associations.

Part II - Sounds and beyond
Piotr Sadowsky is, in his article 'The sound as an echo to the sense :
The iconicity of English gl- words', interested in the role played by
iconicity in the evolution of the English lexicon. He takes for his
study the group of words beginning with -gl in English, showing that
these words form a coherent group referring to closely related semantic
fields both diachronically and cross-linguistically. According to
Sadowski's study, this grouping suggests some iconic motivation, which
seems to be language-specific.

The essay by Ralf Norrman 'On natural motivation in metaphors : The
case of cucurbits' aims at showing the strong relation between the
tenor and the vehicle in the case of the metaphorical use of the
cucurbits in many cultures and languages, as well as the phonological
iconicity of their names. The author supports both these points with
examples from a great number of languages.

The last article of Part II, 'Old English poets and their Lain sources:
Iconicity in Cædmon's Hymn and The Phoenix' by Earl R. Anderson, deals
with a number of types of iconicity the author has found in medieval
English literature. He notes the onomatopoeic variety produced by the
scribal substitution, as well as the syntactic iconicity in Cædmon's
Hymn. A large part of the essay is dealing with the Old English
translation of the anonymous Latin poem Carmen de ave phoenice, known
as The Phoenix. Anderson demonstrates how the translation makes use of
sound-symbolic devices to enrich the text of the sensory experience the
Latin text is deprived of.

Part III - Visual iconicity : Typography and the use of images
In her article on 'Iconic punctuation : Ellipsis marks in a historical
perspective' , Anne C. Henri investigates the iconic value of the
ellipsis mark. She shows that for the last four hundred years, the
variant graphic forms of ellipsis have evolved in direct response to
the evolution of literary and artistic preoccupations, as well as the
that of economic conditions. The author pleads for a detailed and
pragmatic analysis of punctuation as symptoms of the social and
historical conditions that brought them into being, as well as signs of
the 'art' of printing.

Max Nänny investigates another typographic aspect of the iconic use of
the visual text length in his essay on the 'Iconic functions of long
and short lines'. Using seventeenth- and eighteenth-century poets as
Milton, Dryden and Pope, the author looks at the iconic functions of
the visually long and short lines, from a metaphorical and diagrammatic
point of view, separately and comparatively.

The author of Iconicity in advertising signs: Motive and method in
miming 'the body'', Robbie B. H. Goh, shows how advertising uses
symbolic, indexical and iconic signs related to 'the body', to the
material world. He illustrates how the shape and orientation of the
advertisement may suggest socio-economic aspirations, especially when
it is directed towards the youth market.

Loretta Innocenti's contribution on 'Iconoclasm and iconicity in
seventeenth-century English poetry' is concerned with the absence of
visual images, in the context of the theological controversy over the
use of images opposing the iconoclastic Reformation to the iconophile
Counter Reformation. She uses poems from Milton and Donne to show how
poetry tends to represent immaterial objects by having recourse to
iconicity, namely to conceptual or verbal iconic forms, even when
images and visual representation are rejected.

Part IV - Iconicity in grammatical structures
Jac Conradie's article on 'Structural iconicity: The English -S- and
OF-genitives' aims to find out to what extent the particular form of
the genitive reflects a natural or iconic word order. He suggests that
the s-genitive with an agentive subject mirrors the S(ubject) V(erb)
O(bject) word order. The SVO order can be seen as a structurally iconic
order mirroring an activity-based narrative or temporal order which he
names the Event Model. As English has developed from a basic SOV
language into a basic SVO language, the Old English object-genitive is
now expressed by an iconic of-construction.

'The position of the adjective in (Old) English from an iconic
perspective'  by Olga Fischer addresses another syntactic issue. She
shows that the position of the adjective, when variable, may be
iconically motivated in that the linear order of adjective and noun
determines the meaning of a noun phrase. She supports this meaning
difference by contrasting Old and Modern English, where the fixed place
of the adjective determined phonological iconicity.

Frank Jansen and Leo Lentz, the authors of 'Present participles as
iconic expressions' deal with the  more pragmatic issue of the choices
left to writers of Dutch cookery books when they need to express the
simultaneity of two or more actions. They show that the defective
nature of the present participles makes it reflect iconically the
status of a subordinated instruction.

In his article entitled 'Of Markov hains and upholstery buttons : "Moi,
madame, votre chien ..."', Jean-Jacques Lecercle faces the impossible
translation of "distortion" of emotional, iconic syntax. He argues that
the French sentence he chose to analyse is and is not a Markov chain,
for on one hand the meaning is progressively constructed along the
Markov chain of increasing determination while at the same time it is
only achieved with end-focus that projects it retrospectively along the
chain (Lacan's "upholstery button").

Part V - Iconicity in textual structures
Wolfgang G. Müller's study on 'Iconicity and rhetoric : A note on the
iconic force of rhetorical figures in Shakespeare' aims at showing how
rhetorical iconicity may mirror perceptions and conceptions of reality
while other imitate emotional states, and other reflect logical
operations. Müller uses in his article Winfried Nöth's distinction
between 'endophoric' and 'exophoric' iconicity broadly understood to
analyse examples of rhetorical figures in Shakespeare's plays.

'The emergence of experiential iconicity and spatial perspective in
landscape descriptions in English fiction' by Werner Wolf is a
historical and broadly textual study of landscape description in
English fiction. He argues that if in the eighteenth century nature was
represented from an omniscient point of view, as an external and static
object, during the Romantic period landscape was presented as
paintings, from the perspective of a dynamic and involved viewer.

Christina Ljungberg discusses the 'Iconic dimensions in Margaret
Atwood's poetry and prose' showing how the author uses different iconic
techniques to suggest the idea of metamorphosis and rebirth, or the
palindromic mirror symmetry to mime the culturally constructed nature
of the way we perceive ourselves and the reality around us. Margaret
Atwood explores the relationship between form and content to make her
readers participate in the creation of meaning.

COMMENT
Content
The volume collects seventeen articles on iconicity in language and
literature, grouped in five parts. It presents nowadays research in
language iconicity in several fields - broadly defined by the editors
as theoretical, phonetical, visual, grammatical and textual.

The authors attack arbitrariness mainly on the field of literature,
where the motivated sign is anchored in context - one of the
characteristics of the book, announced from the very beginning by its
editors, is the predominance of case studies over theoretical debate.

The single theoretical contribution is explained by the editors in
their introduction to the volume. As for the definition of what is
understood by the term 'iconicity', although the reader is invited to
report to Form Miming Meaning (1999), the presentation the editors
provide here in their 'Introduction' is clear and inspiring.

The papers collected here are very different in theme and object, their
heterogeneity providing the reader with a large view on the possible
uses of language iconicity theory. The same heterogeneity, which the
editors confess facing when trying to group the papers into the five
Parts, gives the impression of a multitude of approaches on a parcelled
field, where some essays are easier accessible than others.

Although there are some papers I personally enjoyed more than others,
as a whole, the book is convincingly challenging absolute arbitrariness
by the high quality and interest of each essay.

Editing
The title (The Motivated Sign... 2) and the editor's 'Introduction'
situate the volume as the second of a pair. The book will seem more
user-friendly to readers acquainted with Form Miming Meaning (1999),
since it follows the pattern set by it as to the division in five
Parts, and as to the terminology and the point of view adopted by the
contributors.

I found very interesting the editor's presentation of the use of
language iconicity and of the situation  of the study of iconicity in
language and literature from a broader linguistic point of view. It
provides a welcome initiation for non-specialist linguists (i.e.
undergraduate students).
The summaries are extensive and they allow the reader to a have an idea
of the actual content of the papers since they are extremely
heterogeneous.

The notes and references are positioned after every article, which is
an useful feature for all collection of disparate papers. The volume
has an author index and a subject index which are common to all
articles. A list of contributors is also published at the beginning of
the volume, containing the authors' postal and e-mail addresses, which
I found to be a researcher-friendly device. Finally, the
acknowledgements published in the volume as well as the dedication of
the book mention the loss of Ralf Norrman.

CONCLUSION
The Motivated Sign. Iconicity in Language and Literature 2 is a
definite success for the researchers in language iconicity. It should
also prove extremely useful to poetics researchers looking for the
definition and properties of literariness in language.

To all other linguists and literature students and researchers it is an
open window to each other's field and to motivated sign theory.

REFERENCES
Chomsky, N. (1981) Lectures on Government and Biding, Dordrecht, Foris.

Jakobson, R. (1960) "Closing Statement : Linguistics and poetics" in
Style in Language, T. Sebeok, ed., 350-377, Cambridge, Mass., M.I.T.
Press.

Nänny, Max and Fisher, Olga ed. (2001) Form Miming Meaning. Iconicity
in Language and Literature, Amsterdam, Benjamins.

Peirce, C. S. (1931-58) Collected Papers, vols. 1-6, eds. C. Hartshorne
and P. Weiss, vols. 7-8, ed. A. W. Burks, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard
Univ. Press.

www.es.unizh.ch/iconicity - Olga Fischer and Max Nänny's website on
language and literary iconicity

ABOUT THE REVIEWER
Oana JAN is a Ph. D. student in sociolinguistics at the University of
Rouen, France.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------

If you buy this book please tell the publisher or author
that you saw it reviewed on the LINGUIST list.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-12-2854



More information about the LINGUIST mailing list