13.1020, Review: Lang Description: Battye, Hintze & Rowlett 2000

LINGUIST List linguist at linguistlist.org
Sat Apr 13 17:11:26 UTC 2002


LINGUIST List:  Vol-13-1020. Sat Apr 13 2002. ISSN: 1068-4875.

Subject: 13.1020, Review: Lang Description: Battye, Hintze & Rowlett 2000

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Wayne State U.<aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Dry, Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at linguistlist.org>
            Andrew Carnie, U. of Arizona <carnie at linguistlist.org>

Reviews (reviews at linguistlist.org):
	Simin Karimi, U. of Arizona
	Terence Langendoen, U. of Arizona

Editors (linguist at linguistlist.org):
	Karen Milligan, WSU 		Naomi Ogasawara, EMU
	James Yuells, EMU		Marie Klopfenstein, WSU
	Michael Appleby, EMU		Heather Taylor-Loring, EMU
	Ljuba Veselinova, Stockholm U.	Richard John Harvey, EMU
	Dina Kapetangianni, EMU		Renee Galvis, WSU
	Karolina Owczarzak, EMU

Software: John Remmers, E. Michigan U. <remmers at emunix.emich.edu>
          Gayathri Sriram, E. Michigan U. <gayatri at linguistlist.org>

Home Page:  http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, Wayne
State University, and donations from subscribers and publishers.



Editor for this issue: Terence Langendoen <terry at linguistlist.org>
 ==========================================================================
What follows is another discussion note contributed to our Book
Discussion Forum.  We expect these discussions to be informal and
interactive; and the author of the book discussed is cordially invited
to join in.

If you are interested in leading a book discussion, look for books
announced on LINGUIST as "available for discussion."  (This means that
the publisher has sent us a review copy.)  Then contact
Simin Karimi at simin at linguistlist.org
or Terry Langendoen at terry at linguistlist.org.



=================================Directory=================================

1)
Date:  Sat, 13 Apr 2002 17:12:51 +0200
From:  Joseph Reisdoerfer <joseph.reisdoerfer at ci.rech.lu>
Subject:  The French Language Today: A Linguistic Introduction, 2nd ed.

-------------------------------- Message 1 -------------------------------

Date:  Sat, 13 Apr 2002 17:12:51 +0200
From:  Joseph Reisdoerfer <joseph.reisdoerfer at ci.rech.lu>
Subject:  The French Language Today: A Linguistic Introduction, 2nd ed.

Battye, Adrian, Marie-Anne Hintze and Paul Rowlett (2000) The French
Language Today: A Linguistic Introduction, 2nd ed. Routledge, xiii+345pp,
paperback ISBN 0-415-19838-0, $25.99, hardback ISBN 0-415-19837-2,
$85.00 (first ed., 1992).

Joseph Reisdoerfer, Universität des Saarlandes.

It is with great pleasure and interest that we have read the remarkable
introduction to French language and linguistics by Marie-Anne Hintze,
Paul Rowlett and the late Adrian Battye. As they state in their
prefaces, the authors have tried to write a book on the linguistics of
French responding to the needs of undergraduate students already
proficient in the language but still requiring solid information on
linguistics and the scientific study of language.

The book indeed gives a complete overview on the major topics of French
linguistics.
Chapter 1 (pp. 1-50) describes the "francophonie" and sketches an
interesting survey of the emergence of a standard language.
Chapter 2 (pp. 51-118) is a detailed introduction to French phonetics,
phonology and the orthographical system.
Chapters 3 and 4 (pp. 119-159; 160-256) deal with French morphology and
syntax.
With chapter 5 (pp. 257-310) the authors return to sociolinguistics and
present the varieties of French: langues régionales, patois, français
régional, créoles, niveaux de langues (français soigné, français
familier, français non standard).
In an appendix, we find two maps, the first on dialects and regional
languages, the second on French in the world.
The book concludes with a glossary (pp. 313-325) defining technical
linguistic terms, a bibliography (pp. 326-338) and an index (pp.
339-345).

The most striking feature of the book is clarity: the language is
limpid, technical terms in bold characters are explained in the
glossary, the book as a whole and the different chapters, always ending
with some bibliographical indications for further reading, are well
structured. Doubtless this book is an excellent introduction to French
linguistics (note 1).

It has of course the drawbacks of the didactic genre. Sometimes
simplification leads to questionable formulations. On page 10 e. g.,
the authors write that Romance languages stem from Latin: "Similarities
between these languages are due to their common ancestry: Latin ...".
They missed here the opportunity to introduce the notion of spoken
Latin, of Vulgar Latin.

Diachronic explanations are generally avoided, a disputable option which
certainly does not clarify the description of the H muet/ H aspiré
problem (pp. 107-108) for example.

The pages on stylistic variations -- français soigné, français familier,
français non standard pp. 290-310 -- an important and difficult subject
for non-native speakers of French, are too sketchy and should be
completed using e.g. Bodo Muller's description framework (note 2).

Unfortunately the authors did not include a special chapter on the
lexicon, - neologisms, borrowings from English, quantitative lexicology
(note 3)... - with a short presentation of the most important French
dictionaries -- paper, electronic and online editions -- Petit Robert,
Grand Robert, Trésor de la langue française (note 4) - and it should be
added in the next edition (note 5).

Finally the further reading pages should be completed by adding such
standard works as József Herman excellent monograph on Vulgar Latin (note 6)
(chapter 1, p. 50), Knud Toggeby's Grammaire française (note 7), and La
grammaire méthodique du français by Riegel, Rioul and Pellat (note 8)
widely used at French universities (note 9) (chapter 4 p. 255).

At the end of my critical remarks, here are some quibbles. In the second
chapter devoted to phonetics and phonology the authors ought to have
mentioned the resurgence of the mute e in modern French (note 10). On
the first map in the appendix (p. 311) the authors forgot to indicate
the patois lorrain spoken in the East of France.

I conclude this review by quoting the beginning lines of Gadet's review:
"A sa sortie en 1992 déjà, French Language Today m'avait remplie
d'admiration, et je l'ai toujours tenu pour l'une des indications de ce
que, dépassant la dichotomie entre introductions au ras des pâquerettes
et traités savants, les Anglo-saxons excellaient dans les introductions
de haute tenue. Aussi est-ce avec satisfaction que 1'on voit ce travail
se prolonger dans une mise à jour, par-delà la disparition précoce
d'Adrian Battye".

I fully agree with this judgement except that I hope that this excellent
book will be translated in French.

ABOUT THE REVIEWER
Joseph Reisdoerfer studied Classics and French in Germany (Heidelberg)
and France (Reims, Nancy) and holds a Docteur de 3e cycle in French
literature and a doctorat nouveau régime in French linguistics. He is
pursuing research on Vulgar Latin and teaches old French at the
Universität des Saarlandes.

NOTES
(1) Not surprisingly the reviewers praise the book: Douglas A. Kibbee,
"Rec. Battye / Hintze, The French Language Today 1991," The Modern
Language Journal 77 (1993): 381b (review of the first edition):"...
the volume as it stands is still the best basic introduction to French
linguistics available"; Françoise Gadet, "Rec. Battye / Hintze / Rowlett
the French Language Today 2000," French Language Studies 11 (2001): 142
(review of the 2nd edition): "Un ouvrage à recommander absolument."
Rodney Sampson, "Rec. Battye / Hintze / Rowlett The French Language
Today 2000," French Studies 55, no. 4 (2001): 585-86: "In spite of these
reservations, however, this new edition is to be welcomed as a worthy
successor to the original co-authored by the late Adrian Battye, and it
will surely be received by its intended student readership."

(2) Bodo Müller and Annie Elsass, Le français d'aujourd'hui,
Bibliothèque française et Romane. Série A, Manuels et Etudes
Linguistiques ; 47 (Paris: Klincksieck, 1985), 225-62.

(3) On quantitative lexicology cf. Jacques Chaurand, ed., Nouvelle
histoire de la langue française ([Paris]: Éditions du Seuil, 1999),
675-727.

(4) http://frantext.inalf.fr/tlf.htm.

(5) Cf. Sampson, "Rec. Battye / Hintze / Rowlett The French Language
Today 2000."

(6) József Herman, Vulgar Latin, trans. Roger Wright (University Park,
Pa.: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2000).

(7) Knud Togeby et al., Grammaire Française, Revue Romane. Numéro
spécial (Copenhague: Akademisk Forlag, 1982).

(8) Martin Riegel, Jean-Christophe Pellat, and René Rioul, Grammaire
méthodique du français, 1re éd. Linguistique Nouvelle (Paris: Presses
universitaires de France, 1994).

(9) On grammars used at French universities, cf. Ch. Touratier, "Les
grammaires universitaires du français de ces dix dernières années," Le
français moderne 66, no. 1 (1998): 73-102.

(10) Cf. Chaurand, ed., Nouvelle histoire de la langue française, 6oo.:
"Le e caduc est un son très fréquent en français, en cours de mutation
car les locuteurs répugnent moins qu'avant aux groupes chargés. C'est
aussi lui qui intervient en cas de perturbation dans la chaîne
(hésitation ...); et, depuis peu, en finale chez les jeunes, surtout
après consonne (bonjoure), et même parfois après voyelle ... ."


---------------------------------------------------------------------------

If you buy this book please tell the publisher or author
that you saw it reviewed on the LINGUIST list.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-13-1020



More information about the Linguist mailing list