13.1171, Qs: V Tense Inversion, Acoustic/Written Word Shapes

LINGUIST List linguist at linguistlist.org
Sat Apr 27 20:47:59 UTC 2002


LINGUIST List:  Vol-13-1171. Sat Apr 27 2002. ISSN: 1068-4875.

Subject: 13.1171, Qs: V Tense Inversion, Acoustic/Written Word Shapes

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Wayne State U.<aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Dry, Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at linguistlist.org>

Reviews (reviews at linguistlist.org):
	Simin Karimi, U. of Arizona
	Terence Langendoen, U. of Arizona

Consulting Editor:
        Andrew Carnie, U. of Arizona <carnie at linguistlist.org>

Editors (linguist at linguistlist.org):
	Karen Milligan, WSU 		Naomi Ogasawara, EMU
	James Yuells, EMU		Marie Klopfenstein, WSU
	Michael Appleby, EMU		Heather Taylor-Loring, EMU
	Ljuba Veselinova, Stockholm U.	Richard John Harvey, EMU
	Dina Kapetangianni, EMU		Renee Galvis, WSU
	Karolina Owczarzak, EMU

Software: John Remmers, E. Michigan U. <remmers at emunix.emich.edu>
          Gayathri Sriram, E. Michigan U. <gayatri at linguistlist.org>

Home Page:  http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, Wayne
State University, and donations from subscribers and publishers.



Editor for this issue: Karen Milligan <karen at linguistlist.org>
 ==========================================================================

We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually
best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is
then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was
instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we
would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.

In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it
is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have
taken the trouble to respond to the query.


=================================Directory=================================

1)
Date:  Thu, 25 Apr 2002 17:46:50 -0700 (PDT)
From:  William Morris <wmorris at cs.ucsd.edu>
Subject:  Verb tense inversion

2)
Date:  Sat, 27 Apr 2002 17:48:51 +0100
From:  g <gina.joue at ucd.ie>
Subject:  literature on acoustic/written word shapes/impressions?

-------------------------------- Message 1 -------------------------------

Date:  Thu, 25 Apr 2002 17:46:50 -0700 (PDT)
From:  William Morris <wmorris at cs.ucsd.edu>
Subject:  Verb tense inversion


Short question:
Does anyone know of any language in which past tense verbs
can take on future tense meaning and vice versa?

The background:
Biblical Hebrew has a strange syntactic/morphological construction
that is usually called the waw-consecutive (or vav-consecutive).
Other names for this construction are "waw conversive" & "waw
conservative".

The word for "and" in Hebrew is the letter "waw", which is attached to
the beginning of the following word.  In Biblical Hebrew (mercifully
not in Modern Hebrew) the attachment of a waw to a verb causes the
sense to invert; past becomes future, future becomes past.  And, since
Biblical Hebrew was primarily a verb-initial language, this usage
occurred frequently.  It appears that the heavy use of "and" was the
standard narrative style, as can be seen in almost any translation of
the Hebrew Bible.

Deeper, but still shallow, background:
Weingreen, 1959, A Practical Grammar for Classical Hebrew, 2nd
Edition, p252, quoting Professor G.R. Driver of Oxford, attributes
this to Hebrew being a "composite" language, with elements of both
Aramaic style verbs and Akkadian style verbs.  According to this
explanation, some Akkadian verb forms denoting aspect were
superficially similar to the Aramaic verb forms that denoted tense,
and regularization led to . . . you get the picture.



A friend recently asked me whether any other languages have anything
at all similar to this.  I am most interested in verb phenomena, but I
would also be interested if some odd construction causes singular
nouns to mean plural, and vice versa.

I will post a summary.  Thanks!

Bill Morris
wmorris at ucsd.edu


-------------------------------- Message 2 -------------------------------

Date:  Sat, 27 Apr 2002 17:48:51 +0100
From:  g <gina.joue at ucd.ie>
Subject:  literature on acoustic/written word shapes/impressions?

Hi,

Can someone direct me to research (and the proper terminology!) done on the
factors that contribute to why "center", for example, may be better
recognised when abbreviated "ctr" than "cnr"? I am also looking for analogous
research for spoken word recognition (e.g. perhaps "defily" is a more
recognisable corruption than "detily" for "definitely").

Thanks in advance,
Gina

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-13-1171



More information about the Linguist mailing list