13.1902, Calls: Lexical Markers of Common Grounds

LINGUIST List linguist at linguistlist.org
Fri Jul 12 03:43:26 UTC 2002

LINGUIST List:  Vol-13-1902. Thu Jul 11 2002. ISSN: 1068-4875.

Subject: 13.1902, Calls: Lexical Markers of Common Grounds

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Wayne State U.<aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Dry, Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at linguistlist.org>

Reviews (reviews at linguistlist.org):
	Simin Karimi, U. of Arizona
	Terence Langendoen, U. of Arizona

Consulting Editor:
        Andrew Carnie, U. of Arizona <carnie at linguistlist.org>

Editors (linguist at linguistlist.org):
	Karen Milligan, WSU 		Naomi Ogasawara, EMU
	James Yuells, EMU		Marie Klopfenstein, WSU
	Michael Appleby, EMU		Heather Taylor, EMU
	Ljuba Veselinova, Stockholm U.	Richard John Harvey, EMU
	Dina Kapetangianni, EMU		Renee Galvis, WSU
	Karolina Owczarzak, EMU		Anita Wang, EMU

Software: John Remmers, E. Michigan U. <remmers at emunix.emich.edu>
          Gayathri Sriram, E. Michigan U. <gayatri at linguistlist.org>
          Zhenwei Chen, E. Michigan U. <zhenwei at linguistlist.org>

Home Page:  http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, Wayne
State University, and donations from subscribers and publishers.

Editor for this issue: Renee Galvis <renee at linguistlist.org>

As a matter of policy, LINGUIST discourages the use of abbreviations
or acronyms in conference announcements unless they are explained in
the text.


Date:  Wed, 10 Jul 2002 17:52:41 +0200 (MEST)
From:  Kerstin Fischer <fischer at nats.informatik.uni-hamburg.de>
Subject:  CfP: Lexical Markers of Common Grounds

-------------------------------- Message 1 -------------------------------

Date:  Wed, 10 Jul 2002 17:52:41 +0200 (MEST)
From:  Kerstin Fischer <fischer at nats.informatik.uni-hamburg.de>
Subject:  CfP: Lexical Markers of Common Grounds

Dear Colleagues,

In line with the conference theme "Linguistic pluralism: Policies,
practices and pragmatics" to be held at the 8th International
Pragmatics Conference in Toronto, Canada, 13-18 July 2003, we would
like to invite contributions to a panel on


Common ground is central to any theory of pragmatics,
sociolinguistics, discourse and context.  Yet, common ground is a
multifaceted, heterogeneous category. In monological theories of
context, common ground is seen as consisting of true propositions
only, and the term is frequently used synonymously with the notions of
background assumptions, presuppositions and different types of
context. Also in the fields of pragmatics and context, a
product-oriented conception of common ground prevails, to which true
propositions are added. In the fields of sociolinguistics and
discourse analysis, a process-oriented approach to common ground is
preferred according to which common ground is negotiated and
reconstructed by the coparticipants in interaction. Thus, some of
these aspects, such as solidarity, power, ethnicity and gender, have
long been acknowledged as not given, but as jointly constructed in the
interaction by the employment of particular lexical markers and social
practices. To bridge the gap between a conception of common ground as
either process or product, the notion of conversational record
(Thomason 1992), and the differentiation between personal and cultural
common ground (Clark 1996), as well as a default-context notion and a
context-dependent notion of a dialogue common ground (Fetzer 2002) are
of relevance.

A dynamic conception of common grounds requires the permanent
negotiation of the common situation. For this reason, coparticipants
display to each other - and to their possible audiences - what they
consider to be the common ground of the interaction. One such
mechanism consists of the use of particular lexical markers that serve
the speakers as presentations of what they assume to be common
ground. The functional category lexical marker subsumes various types
of pragmatic markers, including inference triggers and illocutionary
force indicating devices.  Lexical markers express relational meanings
which are calculated with regard to the marker's connectedness with
the proposition, the force of the utterance and the local and global

The goal of this panel on Lexical Markers of Common Grounds is to
encourage interdisciplinary discussion on these two primarily
sociopragmatic notions in order to further our understanding of the
complex processes involved in producing and interpreting lexical
markers and of their relevance and function in administering common
grounds. We invite contributions that address the nature of these
lexical cues as well as the mechanisms by means of which they fulfil
their function to interactively negotiate aspects of common grounds.

If you would like to contribute to this panel, please send an abstract
of about 500 words by September 15, 2002 to either:

Anita Fetzer                   Kerstin Fischer
University of Stuttgart        University of Bremen - Fachbereich 10
Institute of Linguistics:      Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaften
English Linguistics            Postfach 330440
Keplerstr. 17                  D-28334 Bremen
D-70174 Stuttgart              Germany
tel: +49 711 121-3120/3115     tel: +49 40 42883-2516
fax: +49 711 121-3122          fax: +49 40 42883 2515
anita at ifla.uni-stuttgart.de    kerstinf at uni-bremen.de


For details on conference arrangements, see the IPrA website at
<http://www.uia.ac.be/ipra/>. NOTE: IPrA membership will be required
for all accepted presenters.

LINGUIST List: Vol-13-1902

More information about the Linguist mailing list