13.1729, Disc: New: Review: Applied Ling: Hinkel (2002)

[LINGUIST List]

LINGUIST List:  Vol-13-1729. Tue Jun 18 2002. ISSN: 1068-4875.

Subject: 13.1729, Disc: New: Review: Applied Ling: Hinkel (2002)

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Wayne State U.<aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Dry, Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at linguistlist.org>

Reviews (reviews at linguistlist.org):
	Simin Karimi, U. of Arizona
	Terence Langendoen, U. of Arizona

Consulting Editor:
        Andrew Carnie, U. of Arizona <carnie at linguistlist.org>

Editors (linguist at linguistlist.org):
	Karen Milligan, WSU 		Naomi Ogasawara, EMU
	James Yuells, EMU		Marie Klopfenstein, WSU
	Michael Appleby, EMU		Heather Taylor, EMU
	Ljuba Veselinova, Stockholm U.	Richard John Harvey, EMU
	Dina Kapetangianni, EMU		Renee Galvis, WSU
	Karolina Owczarzak, EMU

Software: John Remmers, E. Michigan U. <remmers at emunix.emich.edu>
          Gayathri Sriram, E. Michigan U. <gayatri at linguistlist.org>

Home Page:  http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, Wayne
State University, and donations from subscribers and publishers.



Editor for this issue: Karen Milligan <karen at linguistlist.org>

=================================Directory=================================

1)
Date:  Sat, 15 Jun 2002 10:14:41 -0400
From:  "Ronald SHEEN (UQTR-Langues modernes)" <Ronald_Sheen at uqtr.uquebec.ca>
Subject:  Re: 13.1701, Review: Applied Ling: Hinkel (2002)

-------------------------------- Message 1 -------------------------------

Date:  Sat, 15 Jun 2002 10:14:41 -0400
From:  "Ronald SHEEN (UQTR-Langues modernes)" <Ronald_Sheen at uqtr.uquebec.ca>
Subject:  Re: 13.1701, Review: Applied Ling: Hinkel (2002)


Georgette Jabbour in her review of Hinkel (2002) Second Language
Writer's Text, considers the volume a contribution to applied
linguistics, contrastive analysis, and corpus-based research of L2
text and considers it important because it leads the way to the use of
research outcomes in teaching, the main intent of the book being to
serve the ESL community in planning and designing writing courses for
college freshmen focusing on syntactic and lexical features of essay
texts.  GJ also informs us that "The writer's position is that native
students produce text that heralds published text, and that the
differences between native and non-natives students' text are the
problem areas that need to be remedied."

Given the above, one presumes that the book provides numerous lexical
and syntactic examples related to problems which are not part of
contemporary teaching texts but need to be included therein.  If such
is not the case, one of the main purposes of the book may be negated.
Given this, could the reviewer provided a number of substantive
examples provided in the book which are neglected in available
teaching texts?  The sort of examples which might appear are L-2 texts
lacking in appropriate phrasal verb usage.  However, this would not be
new as we already know that L-2 speakers tend to use single-word verbs
where native-speakers use phrasal verbs..  The question I am asking
concerns what the book tells us that we do not already know.

The reviewer also indicates that the findings of the book constitute a
major contribution to ESL teaching texts in terms of contrastive
analysis.  This is intriguing for two reasons.

First, the applied linguistics literature already provides substantial
evidence to demonstrate that most residual errors in advanced speakers
are L1-linked.  Do Hinkel's findings support this (or not) and, if so,
do the books conclusions include proposals as to how to solve this?

Second, research on the concept of distance between languages
indicates greater incidence of cross linguistic influence the smaller
the distance between languages.  Given this, one would have expected
Hinkel to have at least included texts from L2 speakers representing
the whole range of distances.  Very surprisingly, the author includes
no L1 European-language speakers.  Could the reviewer inform us if the
author addresses this issue and explains why such a limited number of
language-types are represented?


Ron Sheen
Uinversity of Quebec in Trois Rivieres, Canada

 A personal note: LL provides its members with an opportunity to
engage in discussion and debate. To date, my comments, while submitted
with that intent, have been met with only a disappointing silence.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-13-1729