13.1754, Disc: Review: Applied Ling: Hinkel (2002)

LINGUIST List linguist at linguistlist.org
Fri Jun 21 04:33:48 UTC 2002


LINGUIST List:  Vol-13-1754. Fri Jun 21 2002. ISSN: 1068-4875.

Subject: 13.1754, Disc: Review: Applied Ling: Hinkel (2002)

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Wayne State U.<aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Dry, Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at linguistlist.org>

Reviews (reviews at linguistlist.org):
	Simin Karimi, U. of Arizona
	Terence Langendoen, U. of Arizona

Consulting Editor:
        Andrew Carnie, U. of Arizona <carnie at linguistlist.org>

Editors (linguist at linguistlist.org):
	Karen Milligan, WSU 		Naomi Ogasawara, EMU
	James Yuells, EMU		Marie Klopfenstein, WSU
	Michael Appleby, EMU		Heather Taylor, EMU
	Ljuba Veselinova, Stockholm U.	Richard John Harvey, EMU
	Dina Kapetangianni, EMU		Renee Galvis, WSU
	Karolina Owczarzak, EMU

Software: John Remmers, E. Michigan U. <remmers at emunix.emich.edu>
          Gayathri Sriram, E. Michigan U. <gayatri at linguistlist.org>

Home Page:  http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, Wayne
State University, and donations from subscribers and publishers.



Editor for this issue: Karen Milligan <karen at linguistlist.org>

=================================Directory=================================

1)
Date:  Thu, 20 Jun 2002 21:08:52 EDT
From:  GNJabbour at aol.com
Subject:  Disc:Review: Applied Ling: Hinkel (2002)

-------------------------------- Message 1 -------------------------------

Date:  Thu, 20 Jun 2002 21:08:52 EDT
From:  GNJabbour at aol.com
Subject:  Disc:Review: Applied Ling: Hinkel (2002)

On my part, I would like to state that, in a nutshell, corpus linguistics
represents an advanced form of discourse analysis. In language teaching,
teachers do not go without analyzing text and identifying the discourse the
text represents. Teachers choose their own text to work with depending on
their familiarity with the style of the author and the extent to which they
believe the text will add to students' knowledge of the language and the
world. This same reasoning applies to dealing with text using corpus
linguistics techniques, of which retrieving word frequencies and using a
concordancer are the commonest.

Those who need to refresh their knowledge of the core topics in
discourse analysis and corpus linguistics will find the following
reference names helpful: Sinclair and Coulthard 1975, Sinclair 1987
and 1991, Bazerman 1987, Biber 1988 and 1998, Swales 1990. For corpus
linguistics and language teaching pedagogy, Willis 1990 and Skehan
1994 are a good beginning.

Georgette Jabbour, New York Institute of Technology

	
	

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-13-1754



More information about the LINGUIST mailing list