14.606, Qs: Field Recording Equipment

LINGUIST List linguist at linguistlist.org
Mon Mar 3 18:00:43 UTC 2003

LINGUIST List:  Vol-14-606. Mon Mar 3 2003. ISSN: 1068-4875.

Subject: 14.606, Qs: Field Recording Equipment

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Wayne State U.<aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Dry, Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at linguistlist.org>

Reviews (reviews at linguistlist.org):
	Simin Karimi, U. of Arizona
	Terence Langendoen, U. of Arizona

Home Page:  http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, Wayne
State University, and donations from subscribers and publishers.

Editor for this issue: Naomi Fox <fox at linguistlist.org>

Please help us reach our total of $50,000 by making a donation at:


The LINGUIST List depends on the generous contributions from
subscribers like you; we would not be able to operate without your

The moderators, staff, and student editors at LINGUIST would like to
take this opportunity to thank you for your continuous support.

We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually
best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is
then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was
instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we
would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.

In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it
is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have
taken the trouble to respond to the query.

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at


Date:  Thu, 27 Feb 2003 21:57:19 +0000
From:  Jim Long <jimlong at worldpassage.net>
Subject:  Field recording equipment

-------------------------------- Message 1 -------------------------------

Date:  Thu, 27 Feb 2003 21:57:19 +0000
From:  Jim Long <jimlong at worldpassage.net>
Subject:  Field recording equipment

Can anyone suggest good field recording equipment, conventional or
digital?  I'm soon off on an elicitation project and my most recent
experience is with a Sony Professional Walkman, pretty old and there
must be better around now.  I need the usual: fidelity, rugged
reliability, uncomplicated, directional mic, small size (device and
battery), ease of playback and rewind (to hear again), foolproof,
media compatability, ....  Any suggestions appreciated, and I'll post
a summary.

Jim Long

LINGUIST List: Vol-14-606

More information about the Linguist mailing list