14.745, Disc: "Deflation" and "Inflation"

LINGUIST List linguist at linguistlist.org
Fri Mar 14 01:11:34 UTC 2003

LINGUIST List:  Vol-14-745. Thu Mar 13 2003. ISSN: 1068-4875.

Subject: 14.745, Disc: "Deflation" and "Inflation"

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Wayne State U.<aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Dry, Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at linguistlist.org>

Reviews (reviews at linguistlist.org):
	Simin Karimi, U. of Arizona
	Terence Langendoen, U. of Arizona

Home Page:  http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, Wayne
State University, and donations from subscribers and publishers.

Editor for this issue: Karen Milligan <karen at linguistlist.org>

Thanks to the generosity of our subscribers we were able to reach the
$10,000 mark in record time. Because of this we were able to secure a
$1,500 donation from John Benjamins Publishing - a big thank you to
all the crew at JBs!

But we still have a long way to go! Please help us reach our total of
$50,000 by making a donation at:


The LINGUIST List depends on the generous contributions from
subscribers like you; we would not be able to operate without your

The moderators, staff, and student editors at LINGUIST would like to
take this opportunity to thank you for your continuous support.

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at

Date:  Wed, 12 Mar 2003 11:17:06 -0500 (EST)
From:  "Mark A. Mandel" <mamandel at unagi.cis.upenn.edu>
Subject:  Re: Linguist 14.637: "Deflation" and "Inflation"

-------------------------------- Message 1 -------------------------------

Date:  Wed, 12 Mar 2003 11:17:06 -0500 (EST)
From:  "Mark A. Mandel" <mamandel at unagi.cis.upenn.edu>
Subject:  Re: Linguist 14.637: "Deflation" and "Inflation"

In his original post on this topic, Ben Zimmer writes:

> I would also like to know of
> alternative descriptors that might be seen as preferable, in order to
> avoid possible confusion over the opposing senses of "de/in-flation".
> Dahl, for instance, also uses the terms "(rhetorical) devaluation" and
> "revaluation" to describe these processes.

That would be an unfortunate alternative, exchanging a problem for
another instance of the same problem. Economists understand the
direction of "revaluation" -- 'an increase in the value of a currency'
- but that is dependent on its opposition to "devaluation", which
might be seen as the natural tendency over time. Non-specialists
encountering "revaluation" for the first time have no clue that it is
directional at all: analytically, it seems to refer to any change (or
any deliberate change) in the value of a currency, whether up or down.

-  Mark A. Mandel
   Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania

LINGUIST List: Vol-14-745

More information about the Linguist mailing list