14.760, Qs: 'Into-Causatives', Possessive Noun Phrases

LINGUIST List linguist at linguistlist.org
Mon Mar 17 16:02:35 UTC 2003


LINGUIST List:  Vol-14-760. Mon Mar 17 2003. ISSN: 1068-4875.

Subject: 14.760, Qs: 'Into-Causatives', Possessive Noun Phrases

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Wayne State U.<aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Dry, Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at linguistlist.org>

Reviews (reviews at linguistlist.org):
	Simin Karimi, U. of Arizona
	Terence Langendoen, U. of Arizona

Home Page:  http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, Wayne
State University, and donations from subscribers and publishers.

Editor for this issue: Naomi Fox <fox at linguistlist.org>
 ==========================================================================
FUND DRIVE 2003

Thanks to the generosity of our subscribers we were able to reach the
$10,000 mark in record time. Because of this we were able to secure a
$1,500 donation from John Benjamins Publishing - a big thank you to
all the crew at JBs!

But we still have a long way to go! Please help us reach our total of
$50,000 by making a donation at:

http://linguistlist.org/donation.html

The LINGUIST List depends on the generous contributions from
subscribers like you; we would not be able to operate without your
help.

The moderators, staff, and student editors at LINGUIST would like to
take this opportunity to thank you for your continuous support.

We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually
best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is
then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was
instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we
would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.

In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it
is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have
taken the trouble to respond to the query.

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.

=================================Directory=================================

1)
Date:  Sun, 16 Mar 2003 15:44:50 +0100
From:  "Stefan Th. Gries" <STGries at sitkom.sdu.dk>
Subject:  VERB into VERBing

2)
Date:  17 Mar 2003 00:10:05 -0000
From:  karen at linguistlist.org
Subject:  Possessive noun+pronoun in coordinated NP

-------------------------------- Message 1 -------------------------------

Date:  Sun, 16 Mar 2003 15:44:50 +0100
From:  "Stefan Th. Gries" <STGries at sitkom.sdu.dk>
Subject:  VERB into VERBing

Dear colleagues

[apologies for multiple postings!]

A colleague and I are currently working on the construction
exemplified in (1)

(1)
a.  He can trick the doctor into giving him an alibi. (BNC:FF0)

b.  They were forced into formulating an opinion. (BNC:CF4)

c.  He talked me into staying two more days. (BNC:CCW)

Obviously, the common elements are 'V into V-ing' and we also seem to
remember that this construction has been referred to as
'into-causative.' We already have collected enough examples for our
analysis, but, apart from a cursory treatment of this construction in
Hunston and Francis (2000) 'Pattern Grammar', we do not know of any
literature dealing with this construction. Can anybody please point us
to previous works on this construction? I'll post a summary
later. Thanks a lot in advance.


Stefan Th. Gries
- ---------------------------------------------------------
IFKI, Southern Denmark University
http://people.freenet.de/Stefan_Th_Gries
- ---------------------------------------------------------


-------------------------------- Message 2 -------------------------------

Date:  17 Mar 2003 00:10:05 -0000
From:  karen at linguistlist.org
Subject:  Possessive noun+pronoun in coordinated NP

Dear LinguistListers,

I'm looking at the ways English speakers handle the construction of
possessives in coordinated noun phrases where there is a proper noun
and a 1st person singular pronoun, such as "Dave's and my paper was
accepted". I have heard all sorts of variations, including 'Dave's and
mine ...', 'Me and Dave's...', and even 'Dave and I's'.

Does anyone know of any work on this topic, whether sociolinguistic,
psycholinguistic, syntactic, etc?

I'd also like to hear your personal method(s) of handling this
construction, as well as any thoughts you'd be willing to share.

I will post a summary.

Thanks,

Karen Milligan



---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-14-760



More information about the Linguist mailing list