14.1364, Qs: Semantic Restrictions

LINGUIST List linguist at linguistlist.org
Tue May 13 01:55:58 UTC 2003


LINGUIST List:  Vol-14-1364. Mon May 12 2003. ISSN: 1068-4875.

Subject: 14.1364, Qs: Semantic Restrictions

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Wayne State U.<aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Dry, Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at linguistlist.org>

Reviews (reviews at linguistlist.org):
	Simin Karimi, U. of Arizona
	Terence Langendoen, U. of Arizona

Home Page:  http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, Wayne
State University, and donations from subscribers and publishers.

Editor for this issue: Naomi Fox <fox at linguistlist.org>
 ==========================================================================
We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually
best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is
then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was
instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we
would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.

In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it
is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have
taken the trouble to respond to the query.

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.

=================================Directory=================================

1)
Date:  Sat, 10 May 2003 21:51:14 +0000
From:  Seth Minkoff <seth.minkoff at umb.edu>
Subject:  Semantic restrictions on passive or other "voices"

-------------------------------- Message 1 -------------------------------

Date:  Sat, 10 May 2003 21:51:14 +0000
From:  Seth Minkoff <seth.minkoff at umb.edu>
Subject:  Semantic restrictions on passive or other "voices"

Dear Linguist readers:

I am looking for any references on literature dealing with semantic
restrictions on passive, dative shift, antipassive, or other ''voice
alternations'' (in any language): for example, works addressing the
unacceptability of sentences like (1) - (2).

(1) *Mary was resembled by Sally. (cf. Sally resembled Mary.)
(2) *Mary sent the store Sally. (cf. Mary sent Sally to the store.)

I will post a summary of responses. Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,

Seth A. Minkoff
Hispanic Studies
UMass-Boston
seth.minkoff at umb.edu

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-14-1364



More information about the LINGUIST mailing list