15.3604, Diss: Syntax: Georgiafentis: 'Focus and Word Order...'

LINGUIST List linguist at linguistlist.org
Thu Dec 30 14:18:18 UTC 2004

LINGUIST List: Vol-15-3604. Thu Dec 30 2004. ISSN: 1068 - 4875.

Subject: 15.3604, Diss: Syntax: Georgiafentis: 'Focus and Word Order...'

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Wayne State U <aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Aristar-Dry, Eastern Michigan U <hdry at linguistlist.org>

Reviews (reviews at linguistlist.org)
        Sheila Collberg, U of Arizona
        Terry Langendoen, U of Arizona

Homepage: http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, Wayne
State University, and donations from subscribers and publishers.

Editor for this issue: Maria Moreno-Rollins <maria at linguistlist.org>

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at


Date: 30-Dec-2004
From: Michalis Georgiafentis < m.georgiafentis at reading.ac.uk >
Subject: Focus and Word Order Variation in Greek

-------------------------Message 1 ----------------------------------
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 09:14:06
From: Michalis Georgiafentis < m.georgiafentis at reading.ac.uk >
Subject: Focus and Word Order Variation in Greek

Institution: University of Reading
Program: School of Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, Linguistic Science
Dissertation Status: Completed
Degree Date: 2004

Author: Michalis Georgiafentis

Dissertation Title: Focus and Word Order Variation in Greek

Linguistic Field(s): Syntax

Subject Language(s): Greek (GRK)

Dissertation Director(s):
Irene Philippaki-Warburton

Dissertation Abstract:

This thesis explores in what ways syntax and/or phonology are involved in the
realisation of focus and the effect this phenomenon has on word order variation
in Greek.

On the basis of prosodic, syntactic, pragmatic/discourse, and interpretative
criteria, it is argued that in Greek there are two distinct types of focus, namely
information and contrastive focus, each of which is licensed in a different way.

Information focus is realised via the interplay of the Nuclear Stress Rule (NSR)
and the Focus Prominence Rule (FPR), with a local operation, namely p-
movement, applying to ensure that the focused constituent is in the appropriate
position to receive main prominence. On the other hand, contrastive focus
involves elimination of the [Foc] feature of Foc via long distance Agree with the
focused phrase, movement of the focused constituent to [Spec, FocP] to satisfy
the EPP feature of Foc, and subsequent application of the Emphatic/Contrastive
Stress Rule (ESR/CSR). In essence, this means that information focus is
prosodically manifested, while contrastive focus is primarily syntactic in nature.
With respect to the positions focused items occupy, it is maintained that both
informationally and contrastively focused elements can appear in a 'low' or 'high'

Both types of focus affect word order variation, since focusing needs trigger
movement, namely p-movement in the case of information focus, and movement
to [Spec, FocP] in the case of contrastive focus. Thus, the two focusing
mechanisms described above account for the derivation of all attested word
order patterns (including the 'typical positioning' of manner adverbs in the VOS
order) and -at the same time' exclude the generation of non-attested ones.
Within this account, it is also shown that focus 'unlike p-movement' has an effect
on binding relations, and that T to Foc movement is not operative in Greek.

LINGUIST List: Vol-15-3604

More information about the Linguist mailing list