15.580, Qs: Definite Article/Distancing; Semantic Network

LINGUIST List linguist at linguistlist.org
Fri Feb 13 20:34:32 UTC 2004


LINGUIST List:  Vol-15-580. Fri Feb 13 2004. ISSN: 1068-4875.

Subject: 15.580, Qs: Definite Article/Distancing; Semantic Network

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Wayne State U.<aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Dry, Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at linguistlist.org>

Reviews (reviews at linguistlist.org):
	Sheila Collberg, U. of Arizona
	Terence Langendoen, U. of Arizona

Home Page:  http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, Wayne
State University, and donations from subscribers and publishers.

Editor for this issue: Naomi Fox <fox at linguistlist.org>
 ==========================================================================
We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually
best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is
then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was
instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we
would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.

In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it
is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have
taken the trouble to respond to the query.

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.

=================================Directory=================================

1)
Date:  Fri, 13 Feb 2004 08:30:05 -0500 (EST)
From:  Mike Blasenstein <meb9 at earthlink.net>
Subject:  Definite article as distance marker

2)
Date:  Fri, 13 Feb 2004 08:29:01 +0100
From:  "emilie.destruel" <emilie.destruel at wanadoo.fr>
Subject:  semantic network for preposition

-------------------------------- Message 1 -------------------------------

Date:  Fri, 13 Feb 2004 08:30:05 -0500 (EST)
From:  Mike Blasenstein <meb9 at earthlink.net>
Subject:  Definite article as distance marker

I've noticed that the use or non-use of ''the'' in English seems to
mark the distance or intimacy the speaker has with his or her subject.

I first noticed this when I naively paid to see ''Titanic'' when it
first came out: Most people in the movie referred to the ship as ''the
Titanic,'' but the researchers at the very beginning referred to it
simply as ''Titanic.'' Like, ''I first explored Titanic three years
ago.''

I've also seen this happen when older people talk about ''the MTV,''
e.g. ''I don't like my son watching the MTV.''

Also, diseases -- ''I'm wearing a mask so I don't get the SARS.''

In the first case, the omission of ''the'' seems to indicate intimacy,
whereas the inclusion of ''the'' in the other two cases seems to
indicate some sort of distancing.

Is there any theory or scholarship on this? I'm afraid I'm just a
linguist wannabe, and not the real deal, so I hope I'm not asking an
obvious question.

Subject-Language: English; Code: ENG


-------------------------------- Message 2 -------------------------------

Date:  Fri, 13 Feb 2004 08:29:01 +0100
From:  "emilie.destruel" <emilie.destruel at wanadoo.fr>
Subject:  semantic network for preposition

I'm currently working on the spatial gram "On" and more especially,
I'm trying to map out its semantic network. But I am having trouble
finding the prototypical meaning as well as the lexical root of this
particle.  If you have any ideas please could you send me an e-mail at
the above address.
	

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-15-580



More information about the LINGUIST mailing list