16.3501, Qs: 'Not Yet' Constructions; Morphological Analyses

LINGUIST List linguist at LINGUISTLIST.ORG
Fri Dec 9 03:07:45 UTC 2005


LINGUIST List: Vol-16-3501. Thu Dec 08 2005. ISSN: 1068 - 4875.

Subject: 16.3501, Qs: 'Not Yet' Constructions; Morphological Analyses

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Wayne State U <aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Aristar-Dry, Eastern Michigan U <hdry at linguistlist.org>
 
Reviews (reviews at linguistlist.org) 
        Sheila Dooley, U of Arizona  
        Terry Langendoen, U of Arizona  

Homepage: http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, Wayne
State University, and donations from subscribers and publishers.

Editor for this issue: Jessica Boynton <jessica at linguistlist.org>
================================================================  

We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually
best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is
then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was
instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we
would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.

In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it
is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have
taken the trouble to respond to the query.

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.


===========================Directory==============================  

1)
Date: 06-Dec-2005
From: Tony Wright < tonywright at mail.utexas.edu >
Subject: 'Not Yet' Type Constructions 

2)
Date: 04-Dec-2005
From: Zhao Kim Lin < zhao_kim_lin at yahoo.ca >
Subject: Directions for Doing Morphological Analyses 

	
-------------------------Message 1 ---------------------------------- 
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 22:05:26
From: Tony Wright < tonywright at mail.utexas.edu >
Subject: 'Not Yet' Type Constructions 
 


I would like to ask if anyone knows of published research on the
semantics/morphosyntax of ''not yet'' type constructions in English or
other languages.  An example of this kind of construction in English would
be as follows:

a.  I have not seen Mary yet.
b.  He did not steal the vegetables yet.
c.  We don't yet offer discounts.

This contrasts with simple negation involving 'not':

d.  I have not seen Mary.
e.  He did not steal the vegetables.
f.  We don't offer discounts.  

Note that the English ''not yet'' construction is morphologically complex,
in that it involves two free morphemes, ''not'' and ''yet'' which sometimes
can be, but are not strictly required to be, adjacent.  So far I am aware
of similar, morphologically complex constructions in Spanish, French,
Mandarin and Taiwanese.

Two queries:

1. I have not been able to find literature on this English construction or
its equivalents in other languages, and I'd be grateful if anyone could
point me to some research on this type of construction.

2.  I would like to know if anyone is aware of a ''not yet'' type
construction in another language which is morphologically simple, for
example, that involves only a single free morpheme instead of two free
morphemes, or that involves a affix. 

An example from American Sign Language:

g.  I NOT-YET SEE MARY.

Here, NOT-YET is a single, morphologically-simple lexical item (a single,
mono-morphemic word).  I haven't yet been able to find other examples of
morphologically-simple ''not-yet'' constructions in spoken languages.

Any information concerning these questions would be much appreciated. 
Please reply to tonywright at mail.utexas.edu

Thank you. 

--Tony Wright 

Linguistic Field(s): Morphology
                     Semantics
                     Syntax


	
-------------------------Message 2 ---------------------------------- 
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 22:05:29
From: Zhao Kim Lin < zhao_kim_lin at yahoo.ca >
Subject: Directions for Doing Morphological Analyses 

	

Dear Linguists,
  
Are you aware of any well-written and comprehensive set of instructions and
guidelines (including a comprehensive list of abbreviations) used in doing
morpheme-by-morpheme analyses of (unwritten) languages? What I mean is as
follows: what punctuation marks, e.g., hyphen and/or period, are used and
why? E.g., What is the correct practice for the English pronoun ''me'' --
''1SG-ACC'' ''1SG.ACC'', ''1SG.OBJ'', or ''1SG-OBJ''?

I especially need the instructions for fieldwork practices.

Thanks a lot for your cooperation.

Zhao Kim Lin 

Linguistic Field(s): Morphology
 



-----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-16-3501	

	



More information about the LINGUIST mailing list