16.2757, Review: Lang Acquisition/Syntax: Diessel (2004)

[LINGUIST List]

LINGUIST List: Vol-16-2757. Sun Sep 25 2005. ISSN: 1068 - 4875.

Subject: 16.2757, Review: Lang Acquisition/Syntax: Diessel (2004)

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Wayne State U <aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Aristar-Dry, Eastern Michigan U <hdry at linguistlist.org>
 
Reviews (reviews at linguistlist.org) 
        Sheila Dooley, U of Arizona  
        Terry Langendoen, U of Arizona  

Homepage: http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, Wayne
State University, and donations from subscribers and publishers.

Editor for this issue: Lindsay Butler <lindsay at linguistlist.org>
================================================================  

What follows is a review or discussion note contributed to our 
Book Discussion Forum. We expect discussions to be informal and 
interactive; and the author of the book discussed is cordially 
invited to join in. If you are interested in leading a book 
discussion, look for books announced on LINGUIST as "available 
for review." Then contact Sheila Dooley at dooley at linguistlist.org. 

===========================Directory==============================  

1)
Date: 23-Sep-2005
From: Jason Brown < jcb at interchange.ubc.ca >
Subject: The Acquisition of Complex Sentences 

	
-------------------------Message 1 ---------------------------------- 
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 17:11:41
From: Jason Brown < jcb at interchange.ubc.ca >
Subject: The Acquisition of Complex Sentences 
 

AUTHOR: Diessel, Holger
TITLE: The Acquisition of Complex Sentences
SERIES: Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 105
PUBLISHER: Cambridge University Press
YEAR: 2004
Announced at http://linguistlist.org/issues/15/15-3506.html 

Jason Brown, Department of Linguistics, University of British Columbia

SUMMARY

This book is a study of the acquisition of complex sentences in 
English.  The book consists of eight chapters, plus a substantial 
appendix.  This book will be of interest to researchers working on 
language acquisition, and syntax in general.  It would be well suited 
for use in a graduate course in language acquisition, and portions 
would even be suitable for undergraduate courses in the same field of 
study. 

Chapter 1, Introduction: In this chapter, an outline of the structure of 
the book is presented, and what constitutes a "complex sentence" is 
discussed.  This includes sentences with a matrix and a subordinate 
clause, or coordinate clauses.  Furthermore, three different types of 
subordinate clause are distinguished: complement, relative, and 
adverbial clauses, all three of which can be finite or nonfinite.  A 
complement clause serves as the argument of the predicate in a 
superordinate clause, a relative clause as an attribute of N or NP, and 
an adverbial clause serves as a modifier of the matrix clause or VP.

The data used in this study is then discussed.  The data consists of 
12,000 multiple clause utterances from 5 English speaking children 
obtained from the CHILDES database.  As the author notes, this is to 
date the largest database compiled for this type of study.  The two 
hypotheses behind the study are then laid out.  The first is that 
complex sentences evolve from simple sentences.  The author states 
that "the development of complex sentences originates from simple 
nonembedded sentences that are gradually 'transformed' to multiple-
clause constructions" (3).  The second hypothesis is that "children's 
early complex sentences are organized around concrete lexical 
expressions.  More schematic representations of complex sentences 
emerge only later when children have learned a sufficient number of 
lexically specific constructions to generalize across them" (3).

Chapter 2, A dynamic network model of grammatical constructions: 
This chapter lays out the theoretical background of the study.  In 
contrast to a generative approach, the author takes a "functional-
cognitive approach".  The study makes use of both Construction 
Grammar (Lakoff 1987, Fillmore 1988, Fillmore & Kay 1993, Goldberg 
1995, Croft 2001, etc.) and the usage-based approach to grammar 
(Langacker 1988, 2000, Bybee 1995, 2001; also Barlow and Kemmer 
2000).  The chapter first gives a brief overview of Construction 
Grammar.  Construction Grammar views constructions as grammatical 
primitives.  In this way, grammatical constructions are like words in that 
they are pairings of sound and meaning.  The chapter discusses the 
importance of formulaic "pre-fabricated chunks", "low-level formulas" 
and idiomatic expressions to the theory.  Also discussed is the 
continuum between the grammar and lexicon inherent in this view.  
The chapter next discusses the usage-based approach, which views 
grammar as being shaped by usage.  The major differences between 
the usage-based model and the generative model are discussed, and 
they include views about innateness and grammatical development.

Chapter 3, Towards a definition of complex sentences and 
subordinate clauses:  The goal of this chapter is to define the 
phenomena at hand, specifically as "grammatical constructions that 
express a specific relationship between two (or more) situations in two 
(or more) clauses" (41), where the terms "situation" and "clause" are 
given further elaboration.  Most of the chapter is dedicated to defining 
subordinate clauses.  Subsections describe the syntactic and 
semantic features, as well as the processing of subordinate clauses.  
The chapter concludes with a summary of the features of prototypical 
subordinate clauses.

Chapter 4, Infinitival and participial complement constructions:  This 
chapter deals with the first complex sentences to appear in the 
acquisition data: non-finite complement constructions.  After a 
literature review on the subject, an overview of non-finite complement 
constructions in adult English is provided.  A claim of this chapter is 
that the earliest examples in acquisition of this type of construction 
can actually be analyzed as a type of quasi-modal (with no 
embedding).  The next forms that appear are the non-finite 
complement clauses that are truly embedded.  Of these constructions, 
the earlier forms are typically subject control, followed by object 
control.  This path of development is attributed to clause expansion.  
Diessel shows that while the earlier constructions constituted 
propositions that made reference to a single situation, the complement 
clause and complement-taking verb in later constructions that emerge 
are less tightly bound to each other and can be considered two 
propositions.  Finally, several motivations for the order of acquisition 
are discussed.  The frequency of constructions in the ambient 
language is pointed out as one factor, while the complexity of 
constructions is another.

Chapter 5, Complement clauses:  This chapter deals with the next 
complex sentence type to appear in the acquisition data, which is the 
finite complement clause.  One claim is that early complement clauses 
are accompanied by formulaic matrix clauses; that is, only a single 
proposition is expressed, and thus, complement clauses at this stage 
are not embedded.  The chapter argues that the matrix clauses in this 
stage are non-assertive (i.e. they are epistemic markers, attention 
getters, etc.).  The clauses are then divided into 4 different types: 
1) epistemic markers,
2) deontic modality markers, 
3) discourse directives, and 
4) say, tell, and pretend.  

The chapter also discusses performative vs. assertive uses, and the 
role that pragmatics and illocutionary force play.  The general course 
of development for complement clauses is also outlined, whereby the 
formulaic constructions occur, then the performative, then the 
assertive.  This is shown to be another case of clause expansion, 
whereby a single proposition expands in later development into two 
independent propositions.  Again, factors motivating this development 
can be found in the ambient language, in the complexity of the 
constructions, and also in the cognitive capacities of the child.

Chapter 6, Relative clauses:  In this chapter, Diessel discusses the 
emergence of relative clauses.  In a review of the literature, some of 
the more relevant hypotheses concerning relative clauses in 
acquisition are discussed, such as the noninterruption hypothesis, the 
filler-gap hypothesis, the NVN-schema hypothesis, the parallel-
function hypothesis, and the conjoined-clause hypothesis.  Also 
discussed are restrictive vs. non-restrictive relative clauses, and the 
conjoined clause analysis.  The chapter outlines the development of 
relative clauses from simple, lexically-specific constructions into fully 
fledged bi-clausal structures.  The order of development is outlined.  
The first relatives to emerge are described as predicate nominal 
amalgams in which the relative clause is not independent of the matrix 
clause.  The next constructions to emerge are fully bi-clausal 
structures in which two independent propositions are expressed.  
Much like the infinitival and complement clauses discussed in the 
previous two chapters, the acquisition of relative clauses involves an 
incremental development from simple to more complex clauses.  This 
development is again of the "clause expansion" type that was seen for 
non-finite and finite complement clauses.

Chapter 7, Adverbial and co-ordinate clauses:  This chapter discusses 
how these two types of clause are traditionally distinguished 
(adverbial clauses are typically classified as subordinate clauses, 
coordinate clauses are typically considered as non-embedded), and 
how they actually form a continuum (the class of these two clauses is 
termed "conjoined clauses").  The contrast between these clauses 
and those discussed in chapters 4-6 is their path of development.  
While non-finite and finite complement clauses and relative clauses 
develop through clause expansion, adverbial and coordinate clauses 
develop through the integration of two independent clauses.  As 
Diessel states, "conjoined clauses functioning as independent 
sentences emerge prior to conjoined clauses that are integrated in 
biclausal constructions" (170).  Finally, factors influencing the order of 
acquisition of these clauses are discussed, including frequency in the 
ambient language, complexity of processing, and discourse-pragmatic 
functions.

Chapter 8, Conclusion:  This chapter provides an overview of the 
study, as well as an in-depth discussion of the hypotheses laid out in 
the introduction and the relevance of the data from chapters 4 through 
7.  The chapter discusses the various complex sentence types, and 
how their development relates to the usage based model and 
Cognitive Grammar.  Special emphasis is placed on how the paths of 
development for each of the complex sentence types in the book 
relates to the two hypotheses of the study; in particular, how complex 
sentences start as simple clauses, and how they emerge as lexically 
specific constructions and develop into constructional schemas.  The 
appendix at the end of the book (pp. 186-199) provides 14 pages of 
data.

CRITICAL EVALUATION

The book is extremely readable, even for an audience that may not be 
familiar with the syntax of complex sentences or syntactic acquisition.  
For example, in chapters 4-7, Diessel follows a consistent formula for 
chapter breakdowns, which include a literature review, followed by an 
outline of the construction in adult grammar, an exposition of the 
acquisition data, an analysis, and finally, a discussion.  Readers 
should find this format extremely accessible for two reasons: first, it 
makes each chapter easy to digest, and second, it makes each 
chapter directly relatable to the others.

At first glance, one might criticize Diessel for basing an acquisition 
study solely on English data.  However, given the scarcity of data 
available from other languages, and the abundance of English data, it 
made for a strong empirical grounding for the study.  The use of five 
subjects, along with the fairly wide age range of the subjects, gave the 
study an admirable amount of breadth.  Diessel must be applauded for 
providing the first comprehensive look at ALL complex sentence types 
in acquisition, and also for the use of data in the study.  Diessel 
consistently uses data from the same 5 subjects, and the overall 
utterance counts are impressive.  Such a study should set a standard 
for other researchers, especially those interested in how complex 
sentences are acquired by speakers of languages other than English.  
For researchers working on syntactic acquisition in other languages, 
this book should ultimately leave you wondering, would clause 
expansion and integration look the same in these other languages?  
Hopefully Diessel's work will stimulate others to seek an answer to this 
question.

Although it's an excellent overview of Cognitive Grammar and the 
usage-based model, upon first encounter, one may wonder what 
chapter 2 is doing in the book.  The necessity of the chapter becomes 
evident in the following chapters and in the conclusion, where the 
discussion of the data forces the reader to seriously think about 
concepts like formulaicity and pre-fabricated chunks, as well as all of 
the factors that help to determine paths of development, such as the 
frequency of constructions in the ambient language, the complexity of 
constructions, and the cognitive and processing demands that certain 
constructions require.  Diessel makes it a point to show how all of 
these factors are relevant for the acquisition of complex sentences. 

Finally, the hypotheses are exciting.  The idea that all complex 
sentences emerge from simple sentences seems simple enough, but 
the claim that complex sentences arise through two different paths 
(expansion AND integration) can only be taken seriously with loads of 
empirical data to support it.  Diessel provides exactly this.  

The book is of the same high quality that characterizes the other 
books in the Cambridge Studies in Linguistics series.  The exciting 
proposals and empirical rigour of the study make this both an 
interesting and well-grounded work.  The book should become a 
regular reading in graduate courses in the acquisition of syntax, and it 
should set an example for future studies to follow.

REFERENCES

Barlow, Michael & Susanne Kemmer (eds.) (2000). Usage-Based 
Models of Language. Stanford: CSLI Publications.

Bybee, Joan (1995). Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language 
and Cognitive Processes 10:425-455. 

Bybee, Joan (2001). Phonology and Language Use. Cambridge: 
Cambridge University Press.

Croft, William (2001). Radical Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford 
University Press.

Fillmore, Charles J. (1988). Mechanisms of construction grammar. 
Berkeley Linguistics Society 14:35-55.

Fillmore, Charles J. & Paul Kay (1993). Construction Grammar. 
Berkeley: University of California Press.

Goldberg, Adele E. (1995). A Construction Grammar Approach to 
Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff, George (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. 
Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Langacker, Ronald W. (1988). A usage-based model. In B. Rudzka-
Ostyn (ed.), Topics in Cognitive Linguistics, pp. 127-161. Amsterdam: 
John Benjamins.

Langacker, Ronald W. (2000). A dynamic usage-based model. In 
Barlow & Kemmer (2000), pp. 24-63. 

ABOUT THE REVIEWER

Jason Brown is currently a Ph.D. student at the University of British 
Columbia.  His research focus is on phonological theory, with special 
interests in the phonetics-phonology interface, phonological 
representations, and feature theory.  He is also interested in the 
acquisition of syntax.





-----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-16-2757