17.1674, Diss: Syntax: Drury: 'Alternative Directions for Minimalist Inquiry...'

[linguist at LINGUISTLIST.ORG]

LINGUIST List: Vol-17-1674. Sat Jun 03 2006. ISSN: 1068 - 4875.

Subject: 17.1674, Diss: Syntax: Drury: 'Alternative Directions for Minimalist Inquiry...'

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Wayne State U <aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Aristar-Dry, Eastern Michigan U <hdry at linguistlist.org>
 
Reviews (reviews at linguistlist.org) 
        Sheila Dooley, U of Arizona  
        Terry Langendoen, U of Arizona  
        Laura Welcher, Rosetta Project / Long Now Foundation  

Homepage: http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, Wayne
State University, and donations from subscribers and publishers.

Editor for this issue: Meredith Valant <meredith at linguistlist.org>
================================================================  

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.


===========================Directory==============================  

1)
Date: 02-Jun-2006
From: John Drury < john.drury at mcgill.ca >
Subject: Alternative Directions for Minimalist Inquiry: Expanding and contracting phases of derivation 

	
-------------------------Message 1 ---------------------------------- 
Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2006 10:47:51
From: John Drury < john.drury at mcgill.ca >
Subject: Alternative Directions for Minimalist Inquiry: Expanding and contracting phases of derivation 
 


Institution: University of Maryland 
Program: Department of Linguistics 
Dissertation Status: Completed 
Degree Date: 2005 

Author: John E. Drury

Dissertation Title: Alternative Directions for Minimalist Inquiry: Expanding
and contracting phases of derivation 

Linguistic Field(s): Syntax


Dissertation Director(s):
Norbert Hornstein
Howard Lasnik
Colin Phillips
Juan Uriagereka
Amy Weinberg

Dissertation Abstract:

This dissertation develops novel derivational mechanics for characterizing
the syntactic component of human language ? Tree Contraction Grammar (TCG).
TCG falls within a general class of derivationally-oriented minimalist
approaches, constituting a version of a Multiple Spell Out (MSO-)system
(Chomsky 1999, Uriagereka 1999, 2002). TCG posits a derivational WORKSPACE
restricting the size of structures that can be active at a given stage of
derivation. As structures are expanded, workspace limitations periodically
force contractions of the span of structure visible to operations. These
expansion-contraction dynamics are shown to have implications for our
understanding of locality of dependencies, specifically regarding
successive cyclic movement. The mechanics of TCG rely on non-standard
assumptions about the direction of derivation ? structure assembly is
required to work top-down. TCG draws a key idea from TAG; that is,
recursive structure ought to play a direct role in delimiting the range of
possible interactions between syntactic elements in phases of derivation.
TAG factors complex structures into non-recursive elementary trees and
recursive auxiliary trees that are combinable via TAG's two
operations(substitution/adjoining). In TCG the expansion of structure in
the workspace is similarly limited to containing only non-recursive
stretches of structure. In the course of a derivation, encountering
'repeated elements' in the expanding dominance ordering forces
contractions of the workspace (understood to happen in potentially
different ways depending on the properties of repeated elements).In certain
circumstances, repeated elements are identified, allowing information from
earlier stages of derivation to be carried over to later stages,
underwriting our (novel) view of successive cyclicity. Recursive structure
is retained in the global 'output' structure, upon parts of which we
understand the workspace to be superimposed. 




-----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-17-1674