18.1847, Diss: Socioling: Heffernan: 'Phonetic Distinctiveness as a Sociolin...'

[LINGUIST Network]

LINGUIST List: Vol-18-1847. Tue Jun 19 2007. ISSN: 1068 - 4875.

Subject: 18.1847, Diss: Socioling: Heffernan: 'Phonetic Distinctiveness as a Sociolin...'

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Eastern Michigan U <aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Aristar-Dry, Eastern Michigan U <hdry at linguistlist.org>
 
Reviews: Laura Welcher, Rosetta Project  
       <reviews at linguistlist.org> 

Homepage: http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, 
and donations from subscribers and publishers.

Editor for this issue: Hunter Lockwood <hunter at linguistlist.org>
================================================================  

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.

===========================Directory==============================  

1)
Date: 19-Jun-2007
From: Kevin Heffernan < kevin.heffernan at utoronto.ca >
Subject: Phonetic Distinctiveness as a Sociolinguistic Variable

 

	
-------------------------Message 1 ---------------------------------- 
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 13:23:58
From: Kevin Heffernan < kevin.heffernan at utoronto.ca >
Subject: Phonetic Distinctiveness as a Sociolinguistic Variable 
 


Institution: University of Toronto 
Program: Department of Linguistics 
Dissertation Status: Completed 
Degree Date: 2007 

Author: Kevin M Heffernan

Dissertation Title: Phonetic Distinctiveness as a Sociolinguistic Variable 

Linguistic Field(s): Sociolinguistics


Dissertation Director(s):
J. K. Chambers

Dissertation Abstract:

I begin with a distinction between engendered variation, that is, sex-based
phonetic-level variation that shows consistent patterns across communities,
and nongendered variation. Much of engendered variation is
anatomically-determined, but there is also an important
behaviourally-determined component. One example of behaviourally-determined
engendered variation is that women speak more clearly, as reflected in
their more-dispersed vowel space. I argue that this sex-based difference
applies to all types of phonological contrasts, not just vowels, so that
the temporal and acoustic correlates of phonological constituents produced
by women are differentiated typically more than those produced by men.
Furthermore, I demonstrate that "phonetic distinctiveness" indexes other
social categories such as social gender and social class, i.e., is a
sociolinguistic variable. 

I corroborate the indexing of social categories in two major applications.
First, I compare phonetic correlates in the speech of eight male radio DJs
from a range of music genres with ratings of how macho-sounding each DJ is.
For each DJ, I examine durational differences between contextual and
inherent long and short vowels. As expected, social gender significantly
correlates with the vowel duration distinctiveness so that the more
macho-sounding DJs produce less distinct vowel length contrasts.

Second, I examine dispersion of front and back vowels in the speech of 439
speakers from the Atlas of North American English (Labov et al. 2006).
Vowel dispersion is shown to correlate with both sex and social class.

That men typically produce less distinct contrasts than women leads to
predictions about the role of sex in phonetic-level sound change.
Specifically, if the innovative form results in the loss of phonetic
distinctiveness (such as two vowels merging), then we predict that men lead
the change. An investigation of vowel mergers among the Atlas of North
American English speakers reveals that men do lead mergers, and that
speakers with a less dispersed vowel system show more instances of mergers,
regardless of sex. Thus phonetic distinctiveness as an explanation of sound
change accounts for why men lead sound changes that result in loss of
phonetic distinctiveness, while women lead sound changes that maintain
phonetic distinctiveness. 





-----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-18-1847