18.1915, Diss: Morphology/Syntax: Jablonska: 'Radical Decomposition and Argu...'

[LINGUIST Network]

LINGUIST List: Vol-18-1915. Tue Jun 26 2007. ISSN: 1068 - 4875.

Subject: 18.1915, Diss: Morphology/Syntax: Jablonska: 'Radical Decomposition and Argu...'

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Eastern Michigan U <aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Aristar-Dry, Eastern Michigan U <hdry at linguistlist.org>
 
Reviews: Laura Welcher, Rosetta Project  
       <reviews at linguistlist.org> 

Homepage: http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, 
and donations from subscribers and publishers.

Editor for this issue: Hunter Lockwood <hunter at linguistlist.org>
================================================================  

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.

===========================Directory==============================  

1)
Date: 24-Jun-2007
From: Patrycja Jablonska < patrjabl at yahoo.com >
Subject: Radical Decomposition and Argument Structure

 

	
-------------------------Message 1 ---------------------------------- 
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 11:15:37
From: Patrycja Jablonska < patrjabl at yahoo.com >
Subject: Radical Decomposition and Argument Structure 
 


Institution: University of Tromsø 
Program: Department of Linguistics 
Dissertation Status: Completed 
Degree Date: 2007 

Author: Patrycja Jablonska

Dissertation Title: Radical Decomposition and Argument Structure 

Dissertation URL:  http://www.ub.uit.no/munin/bitstream/10037/991/1/thesis.pdf

Linguistic Field(s): Morphology
                     Syntax


Dissertation Director(s):
Knut Tarald Taraldsen

Dissertation Abstract:

The thesis is an attempt to arrive at the cartography of the low
thematic domain of the clause using data from various argument structure
constructions in Polish. It assumes the existence of a universal
functional sequence (cf. Cinque (1999)) and the theory of morphology
where morphemes are lexically specified to spell out chunks of the
universal sequence. Furthermore, functional vocabulary items are flexible
in the sense that they can be inserted for different subsets of their
lexical specification.

Part I deals with Polish conjugation class markers (so-called 'Themes'),
where a typology of the latter is proposed: high Themes spell out a
superset of the featural hierarchy spelled out by low Themes. Two domains
sensitive to the type of Theme are discussed: (i) verbs displaying the
reflexive clitic (i.e. reflexive, anticausative, prefix-induced, and
Reflexiva Tantum) and (ii) the Impersonal construction in -NO/TO. The
conclusion is that bare stem inchoatives (i.e. Polish low Theme stems or
inchoatives in causativizing languages) should not be equated with
anticausatives. More generally, the notion 'split intransitivity' should be
deconstructed, given a very fine-grained universal sequence.

Part II focuses on another type of functional vocabulary items, so-called
Event Separators (ES) - morphology occurring in various participial
constructions, as well as nominalizations. The main tenet is that the
constant negotiation of spell out options between two items with
overlapping lexical specification (i.e. Theme and ES) results in a typology
of participial and nominalizing constructions. Furthermore, an analysis of
Impersonal -NO/TO is advanced, where an analogy to Germanic/Romance Perfect
Tense is drawn.

The specific algorithm of mapping assumed to hold between the
verbal and nominal functional sequence derives semantic restrictions
on external arguments (i.e. features on Silverstein's Hierarchy,
e.g. animate, human, pronoun, etc.), as well as different degrees of
'subjecthood'. 





-----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-18-1915