18.1465, Sum: Syntax of NP Coordination with PP Modifiers

Mon May 14 19:28:44 UTC 2007

LINGUIST List: Vol-18-1465. Mon May 14 2007. ISSN: 1068 - 4875.

Subject: 18.1465, Sum: Syntax of NP Coordination with PP Modifiers

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Eastern Michigan U <aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Aristar-Dry, Eastern Michigan U <hdry at linguistlist.org>
Reviews: Laura Welcher, Rosetta Project  
       <reviews at linguistlist.org> 

Homepage: http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, 
and donations from subscribers and publishers.

Editor for this issue: Kevin Burrows <kevin at linguistlist.org>

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at


Date: 13-May-2007
From: Myroslava Dzikovska < mdzikovs at inf.ed.ac.uk >
Subject: Syntax of NP Coordination with PP Modifiers


-------------------------Message 1 ---------------------------------- 
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 15:19:39
From: Myroslava Dzikovska < mdzikovs at inf.ed.ac.uk >
Subject: Syntax of NP Coordination with PP Modifiers 

Query for this summary posted in LINGUIST Issue: 17.3584                       

A while ago I asked a question on the list regarding the syntax of NP
coordination with PP modifiers in the examples like
(1) The [boys and girls]_N' [in the picture]_PP are smiling
(2) [The man]_NP and [the woman]_NP [in the picture]_PP made an agreement


My question was how to treat this in the grammar, seeing that PP appears to
attach to N' in the first case, and NP in the second case. I received a
number of excellent suggestions, and I sincerely apologize that it took me
so long to post a summary to the list

The most common suggestion I received is to allow for the ambiguous
attachment both to N' and NP, citing examples from
Ray S. Jackendoff, in X' Syntax: A Study of Phrase Structure  
(Cambridge, MA: MIT Press) pp. 191-192 
and also a variety of cases where it is possible to attach PPs to pronouns,
such as ''John Smith from the bursar's office''.

Several people also suggested treating example (2) as right node rising.

Another suggestion was to check out the treatment in the ERG grammar.
Following up on that, I attempted to parse those and similar sentences
using the online ERG demo at http://www.delph-in.net
It appears that NPs are only allowed to modify N' in that version of the
grammar, returning the semantic interpretations of (2) where ''in the
picture'' modifies only ''woman''.

There is also related research on using underspecification with
coordination and with relative clause attachment

''Underspecification and NP Coordination in Constraint-based Grammar''
Chaves R. P. (2005), In F. Richter and M. Sailer (Eds.), Workshop on
Empirical Challenges and Analytical Alternatives to Strict
Compositionality, pp. 38-58, 17th ESSLLI, Heriot-Watt University,
Edinburgh, Scotland.

Magdalena Zoeppritz: Syntax for German in the User Specialty Languages
System, Tubingen: Niemeyer, 1984.

Tibor Kiss Semantic constraints on relative clause extraposition In:
Natural Language and Linguistic Theory (2005) 23; 281 - 334.

Many thanks to the following people for helpful comments and examples
Emily Bender
Rui Pedro Chaves 
Soyoung Kang
Michael T. Wescoat 
Shuichi Vatabe 
Martin Haspelmath 
Magdalena Zoeppritz 
Bingfu Lu 
Stefan Muller 

Linguistic Field(s): Computational Linguistics

LINGUIST List: Vol-18-1465	


More information about the Linguist mailing list