18.1655, Disc: Tones and Genes: Scientific American

LINGUIST Network linguist at LINGUISTLIST.ORG
Wed May 30 21:18:02 UTC 2007


LINGUIST List: Vol-18-1655. Wed May 30 2007. ISSN: 1068 - 4875.

Subject: 18.1655, Disc: Tones and Genes: Scientific American

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Eastern Michigan U <aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Aristar-Dry, Eastern Michigan U <hdry at linguistlist.org>
 
Reviews: Laura Welcher, Rosetta Project  
       <reviews at linguistlist.org> 

Homepage: http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, 
and donations from subscribers and publishers.

Editor for this issue: Ann Sawyer <sawyer at linguistlist.org>
================================================================  

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.

===========================Directory==============================  

1)
Date: 30-May-2007
From: Roger Blench < r.blench at odi.org.uk >
Subject: Tones and Genes: Scientific American

 

	
-------------------------Message 1 ---------------------------------- 
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 17:16:28
From: Roger Blench < r.blench at odi.org.uk >
Subject: Tones and Genes: Scientific American 
 


An article published in PNAS (Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences) by Ladd et al. and highlighted in Scientific American, attempts
to link tonal languages with particular genes, two genes, ASPM and
Microcephalin. This is because the world's languages are supposed to divide
neatly into two categories, tonal and non-tonal. I would have thought any
competent linguist with an interest in this area knows how untrue this is.
The tonal properties of many languages remain disputed (e.g. Cushitic,
Papuan), the classification of pitch accent languages is disputed. But more
importantly, highly tonal languages can be closely related to those with no
tones (e.g. Omotic, Niger-Congo). And yet according to the article these
mutations appeared 37,000 years ago, to account for the genetic differences. 

My question is; who referees articles for PNAS? 


Linguistic Field(s): General Linguistics





-----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-18-1655	

	



More information about the Linguist mailing list