19.1267, Diss: Forensic Ling/Phonetics/Socioling: Fadden: 'Prosodic Profiles...'

[LINGUIST Network]

LINGUIST List: Vol-19-1267. Mon Apr 14 2008. ISSN: 1068 - 4875.

Subject: 19.1267, Diss: Forensic Ling/Phonetics/Socioling: Fadden: 'Prosodic Profiles...'

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Eastern Michigan U <aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Aristar-Dry, Eastern Michigan U <hdry at linguistlist.org>
 
Reviews: Randall Eggert, U of Utah  
         <reviews at linguistlist.org> 

Homepage: http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, 
and donations from subscribers and publishers.

Editor for this issue: Evelyn Richter <evelyn at linguistlist.org>
================================================================  

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.

===========================Directory==============================  

1)
Date: 14-Apr-2008
From: Lorna Fadden < fadden at sfu.ca >
Subject: Prosodic Profiles: Suspects' speech during police interviews

 

	
-------------------------Message 1 ---------------------------------- 
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:08:05
From: Lorna Fadden [fadden at sfu.ca]
Subject: Prosodic Profiles: Suspects' speech during police interviews
E-mail this message to a friend:
http://linguistlist.org/issues/emailmessage/verification.cfm?iss=19-1267.html&submissionid=175362&topicid=14&msgnumber=1  


Institution: Simon Fraser University 
Program: Department of Linguistics 
Dissertation Status: Completed 
Degree Date: 2008 

Author: Lorna Fadden

Dissertation Title: Prosodic Profiles: Suspects' speech during police interviews 

Linguistic Field(s): Forensic Linguistics
                     Phonetics
                     Sociolinguistics


Dissertation Director(s):
Nancy Hedberg
Sosa Juan
Murray Munro

Dissertation Abstract:

This dissertation presents a descriptive study of the prosodic
characteristics of suspects' speech during investigative interviews with
police. During police interviews, investigators direct conversation by
asking suspects questions and making assertions thereby placing the suspect
in the position of responding. Based on whether the suspect is a first-time
or repeat offender, and the type of information suspects produce, responses
are categorized and examined for their properties of pause, tempo, and pitch.
  
Response types explored in this study are affirmative, in which suspects
confirm information in the investigators' questions or assertions;
negative, in which information is rejected; relevant and irrelevant, in
which suspects offer information pertaining or not pertaining to the
investigators' questions; and confessions. Pausal features - response
latency, and pause-to-speech ratio - are found to differ across certain
response types in both groups. In general, for example, first time suspects
pause more than repeat offenders, both before and during turns,
particularly when offering relevant responses. Among the temporal features,
first-time suspects' speech and articulation rates are lower when producing
relevant information than repeat offenders' rates. Furthermore, first
timers' irrelevant temporal rates are higher than relevant temporal rates.
 Pitch characteristics show less distinction across response types than
pause and tempo, although first time suspects' pitch values cluster
somewhat more neatly within response types than repeat offenders', whose
pitch values vary more widely.   

The findings noted above are discussed in relation to previous studies that
address the prosodic characteristics of discourse and emotion. Furthermore,
on the basis of these findings, prosodic profiles of response categories
for first time offenders and repeat offenders are created. The potential
for forensic application of these profiles is discussed, particularly with
respect to deception. 






-----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-19-1267