19.2439, Diss: Cognitive Sci/Comp Ling/Phonology/Psycholing: Finley: 'Formal...'

LINGUIST Network linguist at LINGUISTLIST.ORG
Wed Aug 6 15:23:17 UTC 2008


LINGUIST List: Vol-19-2439. Wed Aug 06 2008. ISSN: 1068 - 4875.

Subject: 19.2439, Diss: Cognitive Sci/Comp Ling/Phonology/Psycholing: Finley: 'Formal...'

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Eastern Michigan U <aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Aristar-Dry, Eastern Michigan U <hdry at linguistlist.org>
 
Reviews: Randall Eggert, U of Utah  
         <reviews at linguistlist.org> 

Homepage: http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, 
and donations from subscribers and publishers.

Editor for this issue: Evelyn Richter <evelyn at linguistlist.org>
================================================================  

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.

===========================Directory==============================  

1)
Date: 05-Aug-2008
From: Sara Finley < finley at cogsci.jhu.edu >
Subject: Formal and Cognitive Restrictions on Vowel Harmony

 

	
-------------------------Message 1 ---------------------------------- 
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 11:21:52
From: Sara Finley [finley at cogsci.jhu.edu]
Subject: Formal and Cognitive Restrictions on Vowel Harmony
E-mail this message to a friend:
http://linguistlist.org/issues/emailmessage/verification.cfm?iss=19-2439.html&submissionid=185987&topicid=14&msgnumber=1  


Institution: Johns Hopkins University 
Program: Department of Cognitive Science 
Dissertation Status: Completed 
Degree Date: 2008 

Author: Sara Finley

Dissertation Title: Formal and Cognitive Restrictions on Vowel Harmony 

Linguistic Field(s): Cognitive Science
                     Computational Linguistics
                     Phonology
                     Psycholinguistics


Dissertation Director(s):
William Badecker
Paul Smolensky

Dissertation Abstract:

Vowel harmony, a phonological process whereby adjacent vowels share values
of a phonological feature, has raised important challenges for generative
phonology, particularly Optimality Theory (OT) (Prince and Smolensky,
1993/2004), a theory of linguistic typology in which output forms are
computed in parallel from an infinite candidate set. The parallel nature of
computations in OT, as well as the unconstrained candidate set for possible
outputs poses challenges for a theory of vowel harmony, which applies in a
local fashion, such that vowels share the same feature value as their
nearest neighbor. Particularly, standard theories of vowel harmony in OT
predict the existence of pathological vowel harmony processes that are
unconstrained by locality, producing patterns that are never found in
natural language. Building on the work of Turbidity Theory (Goldrick,
2001), this dissertation proposes Turbid Spreading, a theory of
representations for harmony that provides a solution to the 'myopia'
generalization in OT. Representations for features are both rich as well as
constrained, making it possible to account for several aspects of vowel
harmony (e.g., non-participating vowels and epenthetic vowels) without
over-predicting. Evidence for the completeness of the predicted typology is
provided using computational methods (i.e., finite-state machines). The
cognitive bases for the typological restrictions on vowel harmony typology
are verified in a series of 12 experiments using the artificial grammar
learning paradigm in adults. In these experiments, English speakers are
exposed to mini versions of vowel harmony languages, followed by a
forced-choice comprehension test. This test contains novel items as well as
items from the training set. In particular, several novel test items
include novel representations (e.g., novel vowels), which have been
specifically held out from training to test. This 'poverty of the stimulus'
method (Wilson, 2006) makes it possible to test learners' bi inferences
towards ambiguous stimuli. The results of these experiments suggest that
learners' biases conform to the cross-linguistic typology of harmony
languages. Learners are biased to learn harmony patterns that are
frequently occurring and phonetically natural, but biased against rare or
non-existing patterns. These findings support the hypothesis that
typological restrictions are grounded in learning biases. 






-----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-19-2439	

	



More information about the LINGUIST mailing list