19.2656, Qs: Personal Pronouns in Asia-Pacific

LINGUIST Network linguist at LINGUISTLIST.ORG
Sun Aug 31 16:31:04 UTC 2008


LINGUIST List: Vol-19-2656. Sun Aug 31 2008. ISSN: 1068 - 4875.

Subject: 19.2656, Qs: Personal Pronouns in Asia-Pacific

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Eastern Michigan U <aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Aristar-Dry, Eastern Michigan U <hdry at linguistlist.org>
 
Reviews: Randall Eggert, U of Utah  
         <reviews at linguistlist.org> 

Homepage: http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, 
and donations from subscribers and publishers.

Editor for this issue: Dan Parker <dan at linguistlist.org>
================================================================  

We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually
best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is
then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was
instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we
would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.

In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it
is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have
taken the trouble to respond to the query.

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.

===========================Directory==============================  

1)
Date: 29-Aug-2008
From: Kirill Babaev < babaev at yandex.ru >
Subject: Personal Pronouns in Asia-Pacific

 

	
-------------------------Message 1 ---------------------------------- 
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 12:29:58
From: Kirill Babaev [babaev at yandex.ru]
Subject: Personal Pronouns in Asia-Pacific
E-mail this message to a friend:
http://linguistlist.org/issues/emailmessage/verification.cfm?iss=19-2656.html&submissionid=188405&topicid=8&msgnumber=1  


Dear Colleagues,

I am writing an article on possible historical links between personal
pronouns of the languages Asia and the Pacific, and gathering data on the
reconstructed proto-language personal pronoun forms. 

I would appreciate to have an advice on where I can find information on the
two points:

1. Is there any clue on the reconstruction of the Common Proto-Australian
personal pronouns? I found some Pama-Nyungan reconstructions, but not
Proto-Australian.

2. The same for Austronesian: though some scholars give Proto-Mon-Khmer
pronouns, but have the Proto-Austroasiatic personal pronouns been
reconstructed?

I will be obliged for any advice on the topic.

Kirill Babaev Ph.D.
Russian State Humanities University
Moscow 

Linguistic Field(s): Historical Linguistics






-----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-19-2656	

	



More information about the LINGUIST mailing list