19.3930, Qs: Adpositions and Case
linguist at LINGUISTLIST.ORG
Sun Dec 21 15:11:43 UTC 2008
LINGUIST List: Vol-19-3930. Sun Dec 21 2008. ISSN: 1068 - 4875.
Subject: 19.3930, Qs: Adpositions and Case
Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Eastern Michigan U <aristar at linguistlist.org>
Helen Aristar-Dry, Eastern Michigan U <hdry at linguistlist.org>
Reviews: Randall Eggert, U of Utah
<reviews at linguistlist.org>
The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University,
and donations from subscribers and publishers.
Editor for this issue: Dan Parker <dan at linguistlist.org>
We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually
best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is
then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was
instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we
would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.
In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it
is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have
taken the trouble to respond to the query.
To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
From: Sander Lestrade < S.Lestrade at let.ru.nl >
Subject: Adpositions and Case
-------------------------Message 1 ----------------------------------
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 10:10:12
From: Sander Lestrade [S.Lestrade at let.ru.nl]
Subject: Adpositions and Case
E-mail this message to a friend:
We are constructing a typological database on languages that both have a
case and an adpositional system. We are interested in the interaction
between these two systems, and want to answer questions like: which cases
combine with (which) adpositions?, which adpositions show case
alternation?, and what are the meaning differences in case alternations? We
now have information on 32 languages. Unfortunately, the semantic
information in reference grammars is often not very detailed. We are
looking for specialist in the languages listed below who are willing to
control and correct the data we collected.
For example, we know from the reference grammar that the P ''bi'' in
Alamblak can combine with an allative itself and having a complement with
absolutive case to mean 'in front'. If the same adpositional form combines
with the referent case it is said to have the same meaning, but more
probably it has a slightly different meaning. This is of course precisely
what we're after.
The languages in our database are: Alamblak, Basque, Brahui, Burushaski,
Cahuilla, Evenki, Finnish, Gamo, Georgian, Harar Oromo, Ika, Jaqaru,
Kabardian, Ket, Kolyma Yukaghir, Korana, Lezgian, Macushi, Malayalam,
Mapudungun, Marathi, Meitei, Mochica, Newar, Paumari, Polish, Puelche, SE
Pomo, Tlingit, Trumai, Turkish, Warao.
Looking forward to your responses,
Sander Lestrade, Kees de Schepper, Joost Zwarts (Universities of Nijmegen
Linguistic Field(s): Syntax
LINGUIST List: Vol-19-3930
More information about the Linguist