19.3524, Diss: Semantics: Huitink: 'Modals, Conditionals and Compositionality'

LINGUIST Network linguist at LINGUISTLIST.ORG
Wed Nov 19 16:31:55 UTC 2008


LINGUIST List: Vol-19-3524. Wed Nov 19 2008. ISSN: 1068 - 4875.

Subject: 19.3524, Diss: Semantics: Huitink: 'Modals, Conditionals and Compositionality'

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Eastern Michigan U <aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Aristar-Dry, Eastern Michigan U <hdry at linguistlist.org>
 
Reviews: Randall Eggert, U of Utah  
         <reviews at linguistlist.org> 

Homepage: http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, 
and donations from subscribers and publishers.

Editor for this issue: Evelyn Richter <evelyn at linguistlist.org>
================================================================  

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.

===========================Directory==============================  

1)
Date: 19-Nov-2008
From: Janneke Huitink < janneke.huitink at gmail.com >
Subject: Modals, Conditionals and Compositionality

 

	
-------------------------Message 1 ---------------------------------- 
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:30:23
From: Janneke Huitink [janneke.huitink at gmail.com]
Subject: Modals, Conditionals and Compositionality

E-mail this message to a friend:
http://linguistlist.org/issues/emailmessage/verification.cfm?iss=19-3524.html&submissionid=196888&topicid=14&msgnumber=1
  


Institution: Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen 
Program: Department of Philosophy 
Dissertation Status: Completed 
Degree Date: 2008 

Author: Janneke Huitink

Dissertation Title: Modals, Conditionals and Compositionality 

Dissertation URL:  http://ncs.ruhosting.nl/janneke/diss.html

Linguistic Field(s): Semantics


Dissertation Director(s):
Rob van der Sandt
Bart Geurts

Dissertation Abstract:

This dissertation concerns three constructions in which modal or
conditional expressions seem to fail to contribute their ordinary meaning,
or even appear to go completely uninterpreted. I first discuss concord
readings for combinations of modal verbs and adverbs as in 'It may perhaps
be raining'. After arguing that modal concord does not follow from modal
logic, and cannot be treated in terms of syntactic agreement, I propose a
type-shifting analysis which treats modal adverbs as polysemous between
their ordinary meaning and a non-quantificational meaning. Then I discuss
anankastic conditionals 'If you want to go to Harlem, you must take the A
train'. I propose that anankastic if-clauses are not arguments of the modal
in their consequent, but are best analyzed as arguments of a higher, covert
modal. Finally, I show that the interpretation of if-clauses in the scope
of a quantifier 'Usually if it is raining, it is cold' can be accounted for
by adopting a partial semantics for conditionals, along the lines of Belnap
(1970). I argue that this makes for a plausible semantics of conditionals,
which is just as good as its main contender (i.e. the Lewis/Kratzer
analysis), and perhaps even better. 






-----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-19-3524	

	



More information about the LINGUIST mailing list