19.3058, Qs: Postmodifying Adjectives

LINGUIST Network linguist at LINGUISTLIST.ORG
Thu Oct 9 13:44:22 UTC 2008


LINGUIST List: Vol-19-3058. Thu Oct 09 2008. ISSN: 1068 - 4875.

Subject: 19.3058, Qs: Postmodifying Adjectives

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Eastern Michigan U <aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Aristar-Dry, Eastern Michigan U <hdry at linguistlist.org>
 
Reviews: Randall Eggert, U of Utah  
         <reviews at linguistlist.org> 

Homepage: http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, 
and donations from subscribers and publishers.

Editor for this issue: Dan Parker <dan at linguistlist.org>
================================================================  

We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually
best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is
then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was
instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we
would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.

In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it
is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have
taken the trouble to respond to the query.

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.

===========================Directory==============================  

1)
Date: 08-Oct-2008
From: Benjamin Delorme < labrador33 at hotmail.fr >
Subject: Postmodifying Adjectives

 

	
-------------------------Message 1 ---------------------------------- 
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2008 09:43:31
From: Benjamin Delorme [labrador33 at hotmail.fr]
Subject: Postmodifying Adjectives

E-mail this message to a friend:
http://linguistlist.org/issues/emailmessage/verification.cfm?iss=19-3058.html&submissionid=192925&topicid=8&msgnumber=1
  


Hello all, 

A quick word to ask whether anyone knew about recent research on adjectives
in postnominal position, such as ''all things supernatural/fluffy'', ''a
thing possessed'', etc.? ''Monster'' grammars such as Quirk et al. or
Huddleston & Pullum are less than explicit on the subject. 

Thanks,
Labrador 

Linguistic Field(s): Syntax






-----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-19-3058	

	



More information about the LINGUIST mailing list