19.2950, Diss: Socioling: Sherman: 'Proselyting in First-Contact Situations'

[LINGUIST Network]

LINGUIST List: Vol-19-2950. Mon Sep 29 2008. ISSN: 1068 - 4875.

Subject: 19.2950, Diss: Socioling: Sherman: 'Proselyting in First-Contact Situations'

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Eastern Michigan U <aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Aristar-Dry, Eastern Michigan U <hdry at linguistlist.org>
 
Reviews: Randall Eggert, U of Utah  
         <reviews at linguistlist.org> 

Homepage: http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, 
and donations from subscribers and publishers.

Editor for this issue: Evelyn Richter <evelyn at linguistlist.org>
================================================================  

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.

===========================Directory==============================  

1)
Date: 29-Sep-2008
From: Tamah Sherman < tamah.sherman at ff.cuni.cz >
Subject: Proselyting in First-Contact Situations

 

	
-------------------------Message 1 ---------------------------------- 
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 13:26:54
From: Tamah Sherman [tamah.sherman at ff.cuni.cz]
Subject: Proselyting in First-Contact Situations

E-mail this message to a friend:
http://linguistlist.org/issues/emailmessage/verification.cfm?iss=19-2950.html&submissionid=191986&topicid=14&msgnumber=1
  


Institution: Charles University 
Program: Department of Linguistics, Faculty of Philosophy and Arts 
Dissertation Status: Completed 
Degree Date: 2007 

Author: Tamah Sherman

Dissertation Title: Proselyting in First-Contact Situations 

Linguistic Field(s): Sociolinguistics


Dissertation Director(s):
Jiri Nekvapil

Dissertation Abstract:

This study explores the process of proselyting as methodically
accomplished, learned, continually developed in particular situations, and
reflected by American Mormon missionaries in the Czech Republic. The
analysis is guided by four research questions: 1) How do missionaries 'do'
proselyting such that it is recognizable to them for what it is? 2) What
interactional work constitutes this process, and how is this work done
through the interplay of the organization of sequence, preference, topic
and category? 3) How do the participants in these proselyting situations
make relevant the given setting, in this case characterized by the contact
between Czech (local) and American (foreign) languages and cultures? 4) How
do the individual missionaries and their church 'behave toward language',
i.e. how do they manage language and cultural competence and their
manifestations through and for the purpose of engaging in proselyting
interactions? Recorded and transcribed first-contact public proselyting
situations are used as the primary data in this study, supported to a
lesser degree by participant observation, field notes, so-called
interaction and follow-up interviews, and document analysis.
Ethnomethodology, or the study of members' methods for producing and
recognizing features of talk, activities, or settings, is the main
theoretical approach. Conversation Analysis, Membership Categorization
Analysis, and Language Management Theory are used as the primary analytical
tools. 






-----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-19-2950