20.1571, Qs: Final Fortition in Upper Alemannic

LINGUIST Network linguist at LINGUISTLIST.ORG
Fri Apr 24 17:10:53 UTC 2009


LINGUIST List: Vol-20-1571. Fri Apr 24 2009. ISSN: 1068 - 4875.

Subject: 20.1571, Qs: Final Fortition in Upper Alemannic

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Eastern Michigan U <aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Aristar-Dry, Eastern Michigan U <hdry at linguistlist.org>
 
Reviews: Randall Eggert, U of Utah  
       <reviews at linguistlist.org> 

Homepage: http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, 
and donations from subscribers and publishers.

Editor for this issue: Dan Parker <dan at linguistlist.org>
================================================================  

We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually
best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is
then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was
instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we
would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.

In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it
is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have
taken the trouble to respond to the query.

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.

===========================Directory==============================  

1)
Date: 23-Apr-2009
From: Jonathan Gress < jgress at ling.upenn.edu >
Subject: Final Fortition in Upper Alemannic
 

	
-------------------------Message 1 ---------------------------------- 
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 13:09:43
From: Jonathan Gress [jgress at ling.upenn.edu]
Subject: Final Fortition in Upper Alemannic

E-mail this message to a friend:
http://linguistlist.org/issues/emailmessage/verification.cfm?iss=20-1571.html&submissionid=214870&topicid=8&msgnumber=1
  


The usual view of the development of the laryngeal contrast in final
position is that final fortition occurred first, followed by apocope of
final schwa which triggered the loss of the fortition rule (e.g. Hock 1991
and references). Hence originally alternating 'Wääg' 'way', which leveled
the lenis from the plural, versus non-alternating 'ewëgg' 'away', where the
original fortis is retained.

However, I encountered a contrary hypothesis in a footnote in Keller 1961
(_German Dialects_, p 47, n 1), where he suggests that fortition never took
place, but instead that short vowels were lengthened before final lenes. In
that case, the contrast would only be relevant after long vowels (since
there was no concomitant shortening of long vowels before fortes).

I don't know how Keller would account for forms like 'ewëgg', but
conceivably a few isolated words with short vowels could somehow be
re-analyzed with final fortes, rather than undergo lengthening. I don't
really believe this scenario, but if this has been accepted by a number of
historical linguists working on the subject, I need to know. Any German
dialectologists out there who know of discussions along these lines? 

Linguistic Field(s): Historical Linguistics




-----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-20-1571	

	



More information about the LINGUIST mailing list