20.490, Qs: Imperative Morphology

LINGUIST Network linguist at LINGUISTLIST.ORG
Mon Feb 16 19:01:18 UTC 2009


LINGUIST List: Vol-20-490. Mon Feb 16 2009. ISSN: 1068 - 4875.

Subject: 20.490, Qs: Imperative Morphology

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Eastern Michigan U <aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Aristar-Dry, Eastern Michigan U <hdry at linguistlist.org>
 
Reviews: Randall Eggert, U of Utah  
       <reviews at linguistlist.org> 

Homepage: http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, 
and donations from subscribers and publishers.

Editor for this issue: Dan Parker <dan at linguistlist.org>
================================================================  

We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually
best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is
then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was
instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we
would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.

In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it
is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have
taken the trouble to respond to the query.

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.

===========================Directory==============================  

1)
Date: 15-Feb-2009
From: Andrew Swearingen < andrew.swearingen at ling-phil.ox.ac.uk >
Subject: Imperative Morphology

 

	
-------------------------Message 1 ---------------------------------- 
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:59:54
From: Andrew Swearingen [andrew.swearingen at ling-phil.ox.ac.uk]
Subject: Imperative Morphology

E-mail this message to a friend:
http://linguistlist.org/issues/emailmessage/verification.cfm?iss=20-490.html&submissionid=205647&topicid=8&msgnumber=1
  


I am currently a doctoral student writing on Romance language imperatives,
but have a broader, typological question that could have bearing on the
discussion.

Is anyone familiar with a language in the world that has no verb morphology
(or very little), but has a morphologically distinct form for the imperative?

Thanks,
Andrew Swearingen
University of Oxford 

Linguistic Field(s): Morphology






-----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-20-490	

	



More information about the LINGUIST mailing list