20.816, Books: Phonetics/Semantics/Syntax: Gryllia - Discourse Analysis:de Groot

LINGUIST Network linguist at LINGUISTLIST.ORG
Thu Mar 12 01:23:41 UTC 2009


LINGUIST List: Vol-20-816. Wed Mar 11 2009. ISSN: 1068 - 4875.

Subject: 20.816, Books: Phonetics/Semantics/Syntax: Gryllia - Discourse Analysis:de Groot

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Eastern Michigan U <aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Aristar-Dry, Eastern Michigan U <hdry at linguistlist.org>
 
Reviews: Randall Eggert, U of Utah  
       <reviews at linguistlist.org> 

Homepage: http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, 
and donations from subscribers and publishers.

Editor for this issue: Fatemeh Abdollahi <fatemeh at linguistlist.org>
================================================================  

Links to the websites of all LINGUIST's supporting publishers
are available at the end of this issue. 

===========================Directory==============================  

1)
Date: 07-Mar-2009
From: Parcival von Schmid < lot at uu.nl >
Subject: On the nature of preverbal Focus in Greek: Gryllia

2)
Date: 07-Mar-2009
From: Parcival von Schmid < lot at uu.nl >
Subject: English annual reports in Europe: de Groot
 

	
-------------------------Message 1 ---------------------------------- 
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 21:21:10
From: Parcival von Schmid [lot at uu.nl]
Subject: On the nature of preverbal Focus in Greek: Gryllia

E-mail this message to a friend:
http://linguistlist.org/issues/emailmessage/verification.cfm?iss=20-816.html&submissionid=207973&topicid=2&msgnumber=1
  



Title: On the nature of preverbal Focus in Greek 
Subtitle: A theoretical and experimental approach 
Series Title: LOT Dissertation Series 200  

Publication Year: 2008 
Publisher: Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics / Landelijke - LOT
	   http://www.lotpublications.nl/
	
Author: Stella Gryllia

Paperback: ISBN:  9789078328742 Pages: 271 Price: Europe EURO 24.77


Abstract:

This dissertation investigates the semantic and phonetic properties of
object foci in Greek, employing theoretical and experimental tools. The
added value of such a combination is that we achieve a better understanding
of the phenomenon under consideration. The main research question that is
addressed in this dissertation is: do preverbal object foci in Greek differ
from their postverbal counterparts?

In the first part of the thesis, Greek preverbal object foci are compared
to their postverbal counterparts with respect to exhaustivity, contrast and
discourse topichood. For this purpose, a number of tests are applied to the
Greek data. On the basis of the results of the tests, it is argued that
preverbal and postverbal object foci do not differ with respect to
exhaustivity and contrast. It is also argued that the two differ with
respect to discourse topichood. In this sense, it is shown that Greek
preverbal object foci are actually fronted discourse topics.

In the second part of the thesis, a production and two perception (one
using natural stimuli and one using manipulated stimuli) experiments were
carried out to investigate the phonetic properties of preverbal and
postverbal object foci in Greek. Moreover, a production and a perception
experiment were carried out to investigate the phonetic realization of
contrast in Greek.

This study is of relevance to anyone interested in the semantic and
phonetic properties of object foci, in tests for identifying foci and
topics or in approaches that combine theoretical and experimental means. 



Linguistic Field(s): Phonetics
                     Semantics
                     Syntax

Subject Language(s): Greek (ell)


Written In: English  (eng)
	
See this book announcement on our website: 
http://linguistlist.org/get-book.html?BookID=40025


	
-------------------------Message 2 ---------------------------------- 
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 21:21:22
From: Parcival von Schmid [lot at uu.nl]
Subject: English annual reports in Europe: de Groot

E-mail this message to a friend:
http://linguistlist.org/issues/emailmessage/verification.cfm?iss=20-816.html&submissionid=207954&topicid=2&msgnumber=2
 
	


Title: English annual reports in Europe 
Subtitle: A study on the identification and reception of genre characteristics in
multimodal annual reports originating in the Netherlands and in the United
Kingdom
 
Series Title: LOT Dissertation Series 182  

Publication Year: 2008 
Publisher: Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics / Landelijke - LOT
	   http://www.lotpublications.nl/
	
Author: Elizabeth B de Groot

Paperback: ISBN:  9789078328568 Pages: 348 Price: Europe EURO 27.42


Abstract:

Over the past few years, the status of English has increased in the
financial communication discourse practiced by Dutch multinationals. The
fact that a growing number of Dutch companies quoted on the Amsterdam stock
exchange introduce an English statutory annual report, clearly marks a
shift in their English language policy on annual reports. As for Dutch
companies operating internationally, the efficient use of English has
become a particular issue with regard to the non-financial texts in the
annual report. Within Europe, recent international accounting standards
have regulated the financial statements in European-based annual reports,
causing European multinationals to be increasingly reliant on non-financial
annual report texts as a means of distinguishing themselves from their
international competitors.
This study explores the discourse conventions Dutch and British companies
rely on in the design of non-financial texts in their English annual
reports. Moreover, it seeks to determine the effectiveness of Dutch-English
and British annual report texts from the perspective of international
financial readers. The cross-cultural analysis of discourse includes an
integrated investigation of contextual features, content features,
structural features and lexicogrammatical features in the written texts and
photographs of Dutch-English and British annual report sections. Several of
the significant cross-cultural differences in discourse are used as
variables in the reader response analysis, which shows an overall
preference for British conventions in written discourse but also a
preference for Dutch-based conventions in visual discourse. 



Linguistic Field(s): Discourse Analysis
                     Lexicography

Subject Language(s): Dutch (nld)
                     English (eng)


Written In: English  (eng)
	
See this book announcement on our website: 
http://linguistlist.org/get-book.html?BookID=40006
 

MAJOR SUPPORTERS

	Brill          
		http://www.brill.nl	

	Cambridge Scholars Publishing          
		http://www.c-s-p.org	

	Cambridge University Press          
		http://us.cambridge.org	

	Cascadilla Press          
		http://www.cascadilla.com/	

	Continuum International Publishing Group Ltd          
		http://www.continuumbooks.com	

	Edinburgh University Press          
		http://www.eup.ed.ac.uk/	

	Elsevier Ltd          
		http://www.elsevier.com/linguistics	

	Emerald Group Publishing Limited          
		http://www.emeraldinsight.com/	

	Equinox Publishing Ltd          
		http://www.equinoxpub.com/	

	European Language Resources Association - ELRA          
		http://www.elra.info.	

	Georgetown University Press          
		http://www.press.georgetown.edu	

	Hodder Education          
		http://www.hoddereducation.co.uk	

	John Benjamins          
		http://www.benjamins.com/	

	Lincom GmbH          
		http://www.lincom.eu	

	MIT Press          
		http://mitpress.mit.edu/	

	Mouton de Gruyter          
		http://www.mouton-publishers.com	

	Multilingual Matters          
		http://www.multilingual-matters.com/	

	Narr Francke Attempto Verlag GmbH + Co. KG          
		http://www.narr.de/	

	Oxford University Press          
		http://www.oup.com/us	

	Peter Lang AG          
		http://www.peterlang.com	

	Rodopi          
		http://www.rodopi.nl/	

	Springer          
		http://www.springer.com	

	Wiley-Blackwell          
		www.wiley.com	

OTHER SUPPORTING PUBLISHERS	

	Association of Editors of the Journal of Portuguese Linguistics
		http://www.fl.ul.pt/revistas/JPL/JPLweb.htm 

	Graduate Linguistic Students' Association, Umass
		http://glsa.hypermart.net/ 

	International Pragmatics Assoc.
		http://www.ipra.be 

	Linguistic Association of Finland
		http://www.ling.helsinki.fi/sky/ 

	Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics / Landelijke - LOT
		http://www.lotpublications.nl/ 

	Pacific Linguistics
		http://pacling.anu.edu.au/ 

	SIL International
		http://www.ethnologue.com/bookstore.asp 

	Utrecht institute of Linguistics
		http://www-uilots.let.uu.nl/ 
	




-----------------------------------------------------------

This Year the LINGUIST List hopes to raise $60,000. This money will go to help 
keep the List running by supporting all of our Student Editors for the coming year.

See below for donation instructions, and don't forget to check out our Fund Drive 
2009 LINGUIST List Restaurant and join us for a delightful treat!

http://linguistlist.org/fund-drive/2009/

There are many ways to donate to LINGUIST!

You can donate right now using our secure credit card form at  
https://linguistlist.org/donation/donate/donate1.cfm

Alternatively you can also pledge right now and pay later. To do so, go to:
https://linguistlist.org/donation/pledge/pledge1.cfm

For all information on donating and pledging, including information on how to 
donate by check, money order, or wire transfer, please visit:
http://linguistlist.org/donate.html

The LINGUIST List is under the umbrella of Eastern Michigan University and as such 
can receive donations through the EMU Foundation, which is a registered 501(c) Non 
Profit organization. Our Federal Tax number is 38-6005986. These donations can be 
offset against your federal and sometimes your state tax return (U.S. tax payers 
only). For more information visit the IRS Web-Site, or contact your financial advisor.

Many companies also offer a gift matching program, such that they will match any 
gift you make to a non-profit organization. Normally this entails your contacting 
your human resources department and sending us a form that the EMU Foundation fills 
in and returns to your employer. This is generally a simple administrative procedure 
that doubles the value of your gift to LINGUIST, without costing you an extra penny. 
Please take a moment to check if your company operates such a program.

Thank you very much for your support of LINGUIST!




-----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-20-816	

	



More information about the LINGUIST mailing list