20.3197, Qs: Frequency of Stop Dissimilation and Assimilation

linguist at LINGUISTLIST.ORG linguist at LINGUISTLIST.ORG
Tue Sep 22 14:46:43 UTC 2009


LINGUIST List: Vol-20-3197. Tue Sep 22 2009. ISSN: 1068 - 4875.

Subject: 20.3197, Qs: Frequency of Stop Dissimilation and Assimilation

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Eastern Michigan U <aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Aristar-Dry, Eastern Michigan U <hdry at linguistlist.org>
 
Reviews: Randall Eggert, U of Utah  
       <reviews at linguistlist.org> 

Homepage: http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, 
and donations from subscribers and publishers.

Editor for this issue: Elyssa Winzeler <elyssa at linguistlist.org>
================================================================  

We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually
best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is
then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was
instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we
would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.

In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it
is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have
taken the trouble to respond to the query.

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.

===========================Directory==============================  

1)
Date: 18-Sep-2009
From: Rémy Viredaz < remy.viredaz at bluewin.ch >
Subject: Frequency of Stop Dissimilation and Assimilation
 

	
-------------------------Message 1 ---------------------------------- 
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 10:43:53
From: Rémy Viredaz [remy.viredaz at bluewin.ch]
Subject: Frequency of Stop Dissimilation and Assimilation

E-mail this message to a friend:
http://linguistlist.org/issues/emailmessage/verification.cfm?iss=20-3197.html&submissionid=230847&topicid=8&msgnumber=1
  


Dear Linguists,

Have studies been made on the relative frequency of assimilation and
dissimilation between stops, in languages of the world, depending on the
phonetic nature of their contrast: aspiration, glottalization,
pharyngealization etc.? That is, could we say, for instance, that aspirates
are more prone to dissimilation while glottalized stops are more prone to
assimilation?

I am interested in resources on distant assimilation/dissimilation as well
as assimilation/dissimilation in contact; to regressive as well as
progressive assimilation/dissimilation. Please do not mention Grassmann's
law and Bartholomae's law which I already know about.

Thank you for your replies,
Rémy 

Linguistic Field(s): Phonology




-----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-20-3197	

	



More information about the LINGUIST mailing list