21.3213, Qs: Phonology - Morphology Interaction

Mon Aug 9 13:24:49 UTC 2010

LINGUIST List: Vol-21-3213. Mon Aug 09 2010. ISSN: 1068 - 4875.

Subject: 21.3213, Qs: Phonology - Morphology Interaction

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Eastern Michigan U <aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Aristar-Dry, Eastern Michigan U <hdry at linguistlist.org>
Reviews: Monica Macaulay, U of Wisconsin-Madison  
Eric Raimy, U of Wisconsin-Madison  
Joseph Salmons, U of Wisconsin-Madison  
Anja Wanner, U of Wisconsin-Madison  
       <reviews at linguistlist.org> 

Homepage: http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, 
and donations from subscribers and publishers.

Editor for this issue: Elyssa Winzeler <elyssa at linguistlist.org>

We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually
best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is
then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was
instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we
would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.

In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it
is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have
taken the trouble to respond to the query.

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at


Date: 09-Aug-2010
From: Diane Brentari < brentari at purdue.edu >
Subject: Phonology - Morphology Interaction

-------------------------Message 1 ---------------------------------- 
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2010 09:22:41
From: Diane Brentari [brentari at purdue.edu]
Subject: Phonology - Morphology Interaction

E-mail this message to a friend:

I am currently working on an article on the morphophonological interactions in
sign language classifier constructions.  To supplement my research, I want to
find parallels in spoken language inflectional morphology for what I have
already found in sign language classifier constructions.  I'm looking for a
language that uses a specific class of sounds for a particular class of
morphology.  A simple (but hypothetical) case would be if a language used only
vowels for tense affixes, and only consonants for person morphology - i.e.,  'a'
(pres.), 'i' (past) 'u' (future) and 't' (1sg), 'p' (2sg), 'k' (3sg).  It could
be more subtle, such as plain consonants used for person markers and consonants
with a secondary articulation used for tense markers. 

So far I have consulted online databases for my project, as well the following

On Semitic languages:
McCarthy 1979. (and similar subsequent work on prosodic phonology)
On Latvian:
Mathiassen, Terje. 1996. A Short Grammar of Latvian.
On general issues of morphology:
Anderson, Stephen . 1992. A-Morphous Morphology.
Mathews, P.H. 1991. Morphology. Cambridge University Press.

I would be happy if anyone could recommend similar information or insight on
this matter.  Thank you in advance, and please respond directly to
brentari at purdue.edu. 

Diane Brentari
Professor, Linguistics Program
Purdue University 

Linguistic Field(s): Morphology

LINGUIST List: Vol-21-3213	


More information about the Linguist mailing list