21.2565, Diss: Phonetics/Phonology: Kaplan: 'Phonology Shaped by Phonetics: ...'

linguist at LINGUISTLIST.ORG linguist at LINGUISTLIST.ORG
Fri Jun 11 13:30:14 UTC 2010


LINGUIST List: Vol-21-2565. Fri Jun 11 2010. ISSN: 1068 - 4875.

Subject: 21.2565, Diss: Phonetics/Phonology: Kaplan: 'Phonology Shaped by Phonetics: ...'

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Eastern Michigan U <aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Aristar-Dry, Eastern Michigan U <hdry at linguistlist.org>
 
Reviews: Monica Macaulay, U of Wisconsin-Madison  
Eric Raimy, U of Wisconsin-Madison  
Joseph Salmons, U of Wisconsin-Madison  
Anja Wanner, U of Wisconsin-Madison  
       <reviews at linguistlist.org> 

Homepage: http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, 
and donations from subscribers and publishers.

Editor for this issue: Mfon Udoinyang <mfon at linguistlist.org>
================================================================  

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.cfm.

===========================Directory==============================  

1)
Date: 09-Jun-2010
From: Abby Kaplan < kaplanas at gmail.com >
Subject: Phonology Shaped by Phonetics: The case of intervocalic lenition
 

	
-------------------------Message 1 ---------------------------------- 
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 09:28:55
From: Abby Kaplan [kaplanas at gmail.com]
Subject: Phonology Shaped by Phonetics: The case of intervocalic lenition

E-mail this message to a friend:
http://linguistlist.org/issues/emailmessage/verification.cfm?iss=21-2565.html&submissionid=2637654&topicid=14&msgnumber=1
  


Institution: University of California, Santa Cruz 
Program: Department of Linguistics 
Dissertation Status: Completed 
Degree Date: 2010 

Author: Abby Kaplan

Dissertation Title: Phonology Shaped by Phonetics: The case of intervocalic
lenition 

Dissertation URL:  http://people.ucsc.edu/~kaplanas/CV/dissertation.pdf

Linguistic Field(s): Phonetics
                     Phonology


Dissertation Director(s):
Armin Mester
Jaye Padgett
Keith Johnson
Grant McGuire

Dissertation Abstract:

The goal of this dissertation is to explore the phonetic bases of
intervocalic lenition -- specifically, voicing and spirantization of
intervocalic stops.  A traditional understanding of phonological patterns
like these is that they involve articulatory effort reduction, in that
speakers substitute an easy sound for a hard one.  Experiment 1 uses a
novel methodology to investigate whether voiced and spirantized productions
are truly easier than their unlenited counterparts: the speech of
intoxicated subjects is recorded and compared with their speech while
sober, on the hypothesis that intoxicated subjects expend less articulatory
effort.  This experiment thus attempts to observe effort reduction in
action in the laboratory.  The results of Experiment 1 do not provide
evidence that voicing and spirantization are effort-reducing; rather,
intoxicated subjects exhibit an overall contraction of the articulatory
space.  Experiments 2 - 4 investigate whether an alternative account of
lenition based on the P-map is viable.  Results suggest that attested
alternations such as spirantization of voiced stops are preferred on
perceptual grounds to unattested alternations such as intervocalic
devoicing.  Thus, the P-map can explain the broad strokes of lenition,
although differences by place found in Experiment 3 do not match well with
the typology.  I conclude with an analysis of intervocalic spirantization
couched within Optimality Theory, and particularly Dispersion Theory, using
constraints motivated by Experiments 1 - 4.  Unlike previous accounts of
lenition, this analysis involves no constraints that directly favor lenited
forms over unlenited ones, since no such constraints were motivated by
Experiment 1.  The constraints that are made available by the experimental
results are nevertheless able to account for a sizeable portion of the
typology of lenition.  I conclude that articulatory factors say less about
lenition than traditionally thought, and that perceptual factors say more -
and that theories of phonology that are committed to taking phonetics
seriously must take notice. 




-----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-21-2565	

	



More information about the LINGUIST mailing list