23.1998, Diss: Korean/Semantics: Lee: 'The Study on Korean Multisemy'

linguist at linguistlist.org linguist at linguistlist.org
Mon Apr 23 18:32:05 UTC 2012

LINGUIST List: Vol-23-1998. Mon Apr 23 2012. ISSN: 1069 - 4875.

Subject: 23.1998, Diss: Korean/Semantics: Lee: 'The Study on Korean Multisemy'

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Eastern Michigan U <aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Aristar-Dry, Eastern Michigan U <hdry at linguistlist.org>

Reviews: Veronika Drake, U of Wisconsin-Madison
Monica Macaulay, U of Wisconsin-Madison
Rajiv Rao, U of Wisconsin-Madison
Joseph Salmons, U of Wisconsin-Madison
Anja Wanner, U of Wisconsin-Madison
       <reviews at linguistlist.org>

Homepage: http://linguistlist.org

The LINGUIST List is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing the
discipline of linguistics with the infrastructure necessary to function in
the digital world. Donate to keep our services freely available!

Editor for this issue: Xiyan Wang <xiyan at linguistlist.org>

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at

Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:31:49
From: MinWoo Lee [meanwoo at gmail.com]
Subject: The Study on Korean Multisemy

E-mail this message to a friend:
Institution: Kyung Hee University 
Program: Deptartment of Korean Language and Literature 
Dissertation Status: Completed 
Degree Date: 2010 

Author: MinWoo Lee

Dissertation Title: The Study on Korean Multisemy 

Linguistic Field(s): Semantics

Subject Language(s): Korean (kor)

Dissertation Director(s):
Sangjin Choi
Wan Chae
Kitak Nam
Jungsup Kim
Kihyuk Kim

Dissertation Abstract:

The purposes of this study are to clarify the production and construal
principle of meaning and to establish the relationship between the meanings
of multisemy. Generally, polysemy has been viewed as a unique phenomenon
which is based on the perspective that one form is associated with a
meaning and mainly examined with cognitive growing semantics. It leads to
the problems that are not only distinguishing meanings but which are
meaningful. However, the part that consists of various meanings is where
there is no clear distinction between meaning and there is a problem that
the various meanings are offered under integrative usage, not under lexical
meaning. Therefore, it would be appropriate to explain the word meaning if
I revise the existing polysemy concept and approach it with the multisemy
concept in order to consider the perception holistically, depending on the

Also, the point of the study of multisemy is to examine the relationship
between meanings. By the way, the study of the relationship has sought to
find out the similarity between meanings from the perspective of semantic
extension or derivation because the study has been done in a lexical
relationship. However, the problem rises from two points; one is that
semantic extension is hard to understand synchronically as it needs to be
covered from a historical perspective, the other is that it is impossible
to describe the derivation because of innumerable possibilities of it.
Therefore, I here will concentrate on understanding and explaining the
relationship between meanings synchronically with this perspective. We
can't see the meaning directly. It exists only as a hypothesis like those
of physical concepts. However, We recognize a variety of meaning which
corresponds to verbal form and is being used freely. Meaning is embodied by
usage only and what we know about a word is the information of the usage.
It is not important to know the ideal meaning separate from its context.
What we have to know is how to use it in reality. Therefore, it is
important that we understand meaning in different contexts. 

LINGUIST List: Vol-23-1998	

More information about the Linguist mailing list